|
1
|
could be reworded to reflect current application.
|
|
2
|
"3. We think Section 2 of Article 8 of the
|
|
3
|
Constitution could be compressed more positively con-
|
|
4
|
sidering the fact that the public school system is
|
|
5
|
established, and/or with a strong respect for it remain-
|
|
6
|
ing established.
|
|
7
|
"4. We are definitely urging that Section 3
|
|
8
|
of Article 8 be retained and left intact. It may be
|
|
9
|
desirable to use language that would more definitely
|
|
10
|
define "school fund" as presented to you by Mr. Beatty.
|
|
11
|
"5. We think Section 52 of Article 3 is very
|
|
12
|
important to safeguard public education and strongly urge
|
|
13
|
that its provisions be retained in an amended Constitu-
|
|
14
|
tion that may be developed as a result of the work of
|
|
15
|
the Commission.
|
|
16
|
"6. In general, we would suggest the elimina-
|
|
17
|
tion of as much obsolete and detailed matter as possible
|
|
18
|
to make the Constitution brief and precise, and that it
|
|
19
|
remain consistent with court decisions already passed to
|
|
20
|
safeguard public education.
|
|
21
|
"Thank you for providing the opportunity to
|
