|
1
|
If that was redundant, I'm sorry, but. as to carrying it
|
|
2
|
farther afield to a declaration of rights that the citi-
|
|
3
|
zens should have against the State, that is, the govern-
|
|
4
|
ment, the ACLU has not addressed itself to that question
|
|
5
|
and, since I am appearing for the ACLU, I don't think
|
|
6
|
that I can really respond, even as a law professor.
|
|
7
|
MR. GENTRY: We don't mind you talking as a
|
|
8
|
law professor.
|
|
9
|
PROFESSOR ROSEN: Well, I have a little diffi-
|
|
10
|
culty taking hats on and off in one spot.
|
|
11
|
MR. GENTRY: But you wouldn't want to see it
|
|
12
|
limited to simply statements that are self-executing?
|
|
13
|
PROFESSOR ROSEN: No, definitely not limited
|
|
14
|
to statements of principle and high ideal. We want an
|
|
15
|
enforceable document.
|
|
16
|
THE CHAIRMAN: You feel that the Bill of
|
|
17
|
Rights should be limited to restraint upon State action?
|
|
18
|
PROFESSOR ROSEN: I think that's the same
|
|
19
|
question I was just asked.
|
|
20
|
THE CHAIRMAN: I wanted to be a little pointed
|
|
21
|
PROFESSOR ROSEN: As the Federal constitutional
|
