|
1
|
MR. ENEY: Would you suggest that that con-
|
|
2
|
stitutional autonomy be so extensive as to grant to the
|
|
3
|
administration of the university or the regents the
|
|
4
|
power to be as selective as they might at any time
|
|
5
|
choose in the admission :of students, or would the fact
|
|
6
|
there is a University of Maryland make it necessary that
|
|
7
|
the power be not quite that extensive?
|
|
8
|
DR. KUHN: Actually, the expectations of the
|
|
g
|
people who have been elected in recent years in the
|
|
10
|
legislature and the Governor and the people of Maryland
|
|
11
|
have placed already by custom the authority to set the
|
|
12
|
standards for admission of students and, while it has
|
|
13
|
been certainly a matter of public concern and great
|
|
14
|
debate, it has not been seriously questioned in recent
|
|
15
|
years and I believe, actually -- Dr. Bard, you could
|
|
16
|
speak on this from another point of view, but I believe
|
|
17
|
this is an area that fortunately, by the opinion of
|
|
18
|
enlightened people of all the citizenry has moved over
|
|
19
|
to control the boards and I think this has happened.
|
|
20
|
Now, the University of Maryland has not
|
|
21
|
attempted to be terribly selective. I mean, move way up
|
