1
|
two that I can recall, but I think that the Governor is
|
2
|
entitled to more freedom of selection than in some detailed
|
3
|
respects he has had, and 1 think that he should have,
|
4
|
vithin reason, a better opportunity to get rid of them, if
|
5
|
there is some shadow or otherwise. You have got to call
|
6
|
them in and try them, and you will have a public circus.
|
7
|
It is vicious and there is contamination of the individual,
|
8
|
and the contamination of the individual shouldn't be neces-
|
9
|
sary in order to get rid of an infrequently objectionable
|
10
|
official who in the end owes some type of loyalty. If he
|
11
|
is unwilling to risk a vicious attack, then I think the
|
12
|
obligation is on him to resign and get out, but the
|
13
|
Governor in that respect, I think, needs some protection,
|
14
|
but it is very vague and occurs only infrequently.
|
15
|
Should the heads of all administrative depart-
|
16
|
ments serve at the will of the Governor?
|
17
|
Yes, I think they should.
|
18
|
He should be given, maybe some restriction
|
19
|
should be put on that in order to keep maybe the Governor
|
20
|
from getting out of hand at times. The Governor is less
|
21
|
apt to get out of hand, though, than the individual, the
|