|
78
|
1
|
they had the power of legislation. Historically, we may
|
2
|
have adopted some of our second houses as a way of getting
|
3
|
more representation, but at least the theoretical argu-
|
4
|
ments were at the time in terms of protecting ourselves
|
5
|
against popular passions, which leads me to think there
|
6
|
is still something to the first defense of bicameralism
|
7
|
as a protection for the property classes, because politics
|
8
|
is still a matter of taking from some people and giving to
|
9
|
other people, and those that have are usually the ones
|
10
|
that are not particularly interested in active government
|
11
|
and those that don't have tend to be the driving force for
|
12
|
governmental action in our time.
|
13
|
I think — these are a lot of disjointed state-
|
14
|
ments, but these have been building up as I have been
|
15
|
listening to the previous comments. I think you are
|
16
|
going to be terribly disappointed if you seek to find
|
17
|
data, empirical data that will support or clearly differ-
|
18
|
entiate these issues. I think you are going to end up
|
19
|
having to make some kind of decision on this on the basis
|
20
|
of perhaps theory.
|
21
|
When our government was set up, the dominant
|