|
42
|
1
|
Now, it would be possible, I think, to get some data on
|
2
|
what happened in that exchange from one to the other at
|
3
|
the local level, because the original arguments for a
|
4
|
bicameral city council were almost identical with those
|
5
|
which are made for the bicameral state legislature; that
|
6
|
is, it was a question of the representation of different
|
7
|
interests, it was a question of a review, so you don't get
|
8
|
hasty and ill-considered legislation, et cetera.
|
9
|
So that the evidence, I think, would have to
|
10
|
come from what has happened not with respect to a compari-
|
11
|
son between the local and the state, but what has happened
|
12
|
locally between one legislature and the other.
|
13
|
The other thing which I would like to suggest,
|
14
|
and I won't take time, Mr. Chairman, to present it now,
|
15
|
that there is considerable evidence, statistical evidence,
|
16
|
even, with respect to this matter of how much is there to
|
17
|
this reconsideration by a second chamber. There are
|
18
|
statistical studies on this on individual state legisla-
|
19
|
tures to show how important or unimportant, as you going
|
20
|
to interpret it, this matter is of reconsideration by the
|
21
|
second house.
|