|
1
|
argument are well represented by Mr. Pressman and I think
|
|
2
|
the opponents of deleting the provision have also been
|
|
3
|
very well represented by the spokesmen for the Episcopal
|
|
4
|
and Baptist churches.
|
|
5
|
However, it is disappointing to the Chairman
|
|
6
|
at least that we didn't have a larger representation
|
|
7
|
and cross-section of people present at this hearing. I
|
|
8
|
am wondering whether or not it indicates, as Mr. Pressman
|
|
9
|
has suggested, some lack of real interest in continuing
|
|
10
|
this provision in the Constitution. I think it certainly
|
|
11
|
might be interpreted that way.
|
|
12
|
So that the record can be absolutely clear,
|
|
13
|
1 am going to ask the reporter to place into the record
|
|
14
|
people who were invited to this meeting and we can then
|
|
15
|
see who did and who did not attend.
|
|
16
|
August 8, 1966
|
|
17
|
TO: The Committee on State Finance and
|
|
18
|
Taxation
|
|
19
|
The following persons or organizations have
|
|
20
|
received the same letter as attached addressed to Mr.
|
|
21
|
Pressman:
|
