|
1
|
have to have a second hearing on a controversial issue
|
|
2
|
when it gets to the other house. That is my experience.
|
|
3
|
MR. ENEY: A joint hearing doesn't mean joint
|
|
4
|
consideration.
|
|
5
|
THE CHAIRMAN: A good point. And they don't
|
|
6
|
do it on all occasions. I am appearing next week before
|
|
7
|
the House Education Committee and before the Senate
|
|
8
|
Education Committee on two different days.
|
|
9
|
MR. DELLA: And the same people have to come
|
|
10
|
down and testify before both houses, if they are inter-
|
|
11
|
ested.
|
|
12
|
DR. WINSLOW: I was going to remark to the
|
|
13
|
degree, I want to emphasize Dr. Michener's point, to the
|
|
14
|
degree that joint committees, whether regular standing
|
|
15
|
committees or occasional, as you suggest, Mrs. Freedlander,
|
|
16
|
it is perfectly obvious that to do this gets right in the
|
|
17
|
way of this claim on the part of bicameralists that you
|
|
18
|
get a second consideration, but you don't. The considera-
|
|
19
|
tion which is given to committee reports in the Maryland
|
|
20
|
Legislature, as well as a great many others on the floor
|
|
21
|
of the house or senate, as far as the effects are concerned
|
