|
23
|
1
|
because I am involved in this, every now and then there
|
2
|
are joint hearings and this is one way by which a bicameral
|
3
|
body can break through the unattractiveness of bringing
|
4
|
administrative heads down on two or three occasions in
|
5
|
order to appear for hearings, and this has been happening.
|
6
|
It is kind of interesting as to how the structure of bi-
|
7
|
cameralism tries to adapt itself in order to avoid com-
|
8
|
mittee overhauling.
|
g
|
DR. MICHENER: To anticipate something further
|
10
|
on, in connection with joint committees, I didn't mention
|
11
|
the fact of duplicating appearances on the administrative
|
12
|
people which is a serious problem on the Federal level
|
13
|
because, from what little I know about Maryland here, I
|
14
|
didn't find that to be a problem.
|
15
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Yes, it is.
|
16
|
PR. MICHENER: Is it? I didn't know.
|
17
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Yes.
|
18
|
DR. MICHENER: I haven't had a chance to do any
|
19
|
research on the Maryland experience, but I wouldn't assume
|
20
|
it would be as serious here as on the Federal level, but
|
21
|
going on to joint hearings and joint committees, the
|