|
1
|
up to sixteen as compulsory attendance. They are
|
|
2
|
talking now about eighteen, and 1 just wondered whether
|
|
3
|
we couldn't dress up that language a little bit and
|
|
4
|
not call them children.
|
|
5
|
MRS. BOTHE: You are speaking now of our
|
|
6
|
proposed Section 1?
|
|
7
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: Yes.
|
|
B
|
MR. ENEY: Persons, instead of children?
|
|
9
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH; Because a young man eighteen.
|
|
10
|
who is subject to the draft, may not want to be referred
|
|
11
|
to as a child.
|
|
12
|
MRS. BOTHE: We thought of that and one of
|
|
13
|
the reasons we left it that way was because Section 1
|
|
14
|
does deal with the elementary school system and deals
|
|
15
|
with minors, and some state constitutions give specific
|
|
16
|
aid, say up to the age of eighteen, and we didn't want
|
|
17
|
to do that in the expectation that perhaps the com-
|
|
18
|
pulsory age would be upgraded and someday we expect
|
|
19
|
there will be a kindergarten throughout the State.
|
|
20
|
Have you any suggestions?
|
|
21
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: I think that Mr. Eney had
|
