1
|
you think there ought to be one?
|
2
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: I think it would be a pro-
|
3
|
tection, if it were in there, but my strength of feeling
|
4
|
is not quite as strong as what I read concerning what
|
5
|
Dr. Pullen indicated and some others, but it would be
|
6
|
a protection.
|
7
|
MR. ENEY: Has there been any indication in
|
8
|
the years you have been associated with the school
|
9
|
system that if there was any possibility of legislation
|
10
|
changing the system, so far as the appointment of the
|
11
|
Board is concerned, and the Superintendent, that --
|
12
|
DR. SENSENBAUGH: There was at one point,
|
13
|
several years ago. I'm not clear on the details. I
|
14
|
think there was some legislation to change the appoint-
|
15
|
ment of the Superintendent of Schools, the State
|
16
|
Superintendent. It didn't get very far, but it was --
|
17
|
I remember, I was Superintendent, I think it was in
|
18
|
Frederick County. It must be in the past ten years.
|
19
|
There was this type of legislation introduced, but it
|
20
|
never cleared the committees. What the purpose of it
|
21
|
was, I don't know. Of course, there are all kinds of
|