1
|
year.
|
2
|
MRS. BOTHE: Mr. Case, I am confused because
|
3
|
I was under the impression Mr. Eney asked earlier
|
4
|
wouldn't it be possible to get rid of these reversions
|
5
|
and divert them during the year, and Mr. Perkins said
|
6
|
it would be, except it would come so late, it wouldn't
|
7
|
be practical.
|
8
|
MR. PERKINS: I didn't say that. He asked
|
9
|
me a direct question and --
|
10
|
MR. CASE: Nobody said that.
|
11
|
MRS. BOTHE: Is it theoretically possible,
|
12
|
if impractical, to take what is thought or known to be
|
13
|
a reversion and divert it during the budget year?
|
14
|
MR. CASE: No. That is the whole burden of
|
15
|
this discussion. It cannot be used for any other pur-
|
16
|
pose.
|
17
|
MR. ENEY: But only because the statute pre-
|
18
|
vents that kind of a budget amendment.
|
19
|
MR. CASE: Right.
|
20
|
MR. ENEY: But there is no constitutional
|
21
|
prohibition.
|