|
1
|
subject? Mr. Raver, on Page 174 of the record of the hear-
|
|
2
|
ing on June 9, I said the following, in reference to a
|
|
3
|
bill which I called, quote, The bracket bill, unquote, and
|
|
4
|
you might wish to correct this, and that is why I an read-
|
|
5
|
ing it to you. I said, This was a bill which found its
|
|
6
|
way into the legislative hopper at the time the Sherbow
|
|
7
|
Commission's Report was implemented. It would have, in
|
|
8
|
effect, struck out the preferential treatment for public
|
|
9
|
schools so far as the governor was concerned, and would
|
|
10
|
give him authority to treaC their suggested budget just as
|
|
11
|
every other department's suggested budget is treated, to
|
|
12
|
the extent that he could as provided by law. They always
|
|
13
|
put that phrase in, as provided by law. That will take
|
|
14
|
care of everything. Of course, there was a big political
|
|
15
|
whingding, still quoting, about that. Don Pullen went down
|
|
16
|
to Annapolis and stirred around in the nuts and bolts, and
|
|
17
|
the nuts and bolts of it was, of course, that they killed
|
|
18
|
the bill and nobody would ever admit to the authorship of
|
|
19
|
the bill, which is another very interesting thing, although
|
|
20
|
it was stated at the time that Dr. Flack had done it. Now,
|
|
21
|
1 why accuse Dr. Flack, I don't know, but anyway, there hasn't
|