|
1
|
else. In other words, they can't take money out of, shall
|
|
2
|
we say Adult Education or Handicapped, and spend it for high
|
|
3
|
teachers' salaries. They do not have this kind of
|
|
4
|
autonomy. I suppose you could equate one with the other.
|
|
5
|
This was the basis of ray argument earlier. I don't
|
|
6
|
have any quarrel with giving the University of Maryland
|
|
7
|
autonomy in the Constitution, but somehow or another, it
|
|
8
|
seems to me a little illogical to lift them to constitu-
|
|
9
|
tional status and the same time take away from the consti-
|
|
10
|
tutional status of public education, so I guess 1 would
|
|
11
|
answer to you, I suppose these are equitable.
|
|
12
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Of course, we didn't have the
|
|
13
|
University of Maryland in 1916.
|
|
14
|
MR. RAVER: We had a pretty good example of it.
|
|
15
|
It is quoted.
|
|
16
|
THE CHAIRMAN: No. The University of Maryland,
|
|
17
|
I beg your pardon, this is something I happen to know some-
|
|
18
|
thing about, wasn't created until 1920.
|
|
19
|
MR. RAVER: It was there as a State agricultural
|
|
20
|
school or dental school.
|
|
21
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Yes, but run by different boards
|
