|
1
|
MR. SMITH: I haven't quite caught up yet.
|
|
2
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Let me ask this question.
|
|
3
|
DR. JENKINS: Let me say, I don't know whether
|
|
4
|
you will take Mr. Raver's suggestion, but I would hesitate
|
|
5
|
to ask Mr. Zimmerman to come in the absence of Dr. Sensen-
|
|
6
|
baugh invinting him and coming with him.
|
|
7
|
THE CHAIRMAN: I would certainly not want to
|
|
8
|
do anything that would embarrass Dr. Zimmerman, whom I
|
|
9
|
have known for almost twenty years.
|
|
10
|
DR. JENKINS: All right, Dr. Sensenbaugh.
|
|
11
|
THE CHAIRMAN: I haven't known Dr. Sensenbaugh
|
|
12
|
that long, bui I am certain we don't want to do anything
|
|
13
|
to embarrass him, either.
|
|
14
|
Does anybody else have any questions?
|
|
15
|
I have two questions, Mr. Raver. One is, I
|
|
16
|
think you said that this provision in Subsection (11) of
|
|
17
|
Section 52 of Article III that we are discussing in your
|
|
18
|
judgment is the most important single protection that the
|
|
19
|
system has against political interference. Am I quoting
|
|
20
|
you correctly?
|
|
21
|
MR. RAVER: Yes, sir, this is my belief.
|
