|
1
|
State Bar approved a couple of year ago, except the court
|
|
2
|
rather than the independent Commission?
|
|
3
|
THE CHAIRMAN: In principle.
|
|
4
|
MR. MARTINEAU: We don't actually set up the
|
|
5
|
Commission here. We put the power of removal in the court,
|
|
6
|
and then let the court adopt it.
|
|
7
|
JUDGE PROCTOR: By rule can adopt the Commis-
|
|
8
|
sion.
|
|
9
|
MR. RODOWSKY: The pov.-er was never ir the
|
|
10
|
Commission.
|
|
11
|
JUDGE WARNKEN: I wanted to inquire about that.
|
|
12
|
I see you say the Supreme Court of Appeals shall have
|
|
13
|
power to provide by rule for the implementation of this
|
|
14
|
section.
|
|
15
|
Personally I am highly in favor of the court
|
|
16
|
acting in all such matters. I think the idea of the
|
|
17
|
Commission is better. After all the problem is a court
|
|
18
|
problem. They ought to keep their own house in order.
|
|
19
|
I was just wondering whether the Supreme Court would have
|
|
20
|
power to create some kind of a coirniission and give it
|
|
21
|
power of contempt or contumacy or immunity, et cetera,
|
