|
1
|
how do you get rid of him, I think that is covered by a
|
|
2
|
later provision in this draft under which any judge is sub-
|
|
3
|
ject to removal or retirement if he falls down on the
|
|
4
|
job. I don't see why the administrative judge should be
|
|
5
|
exempt from that any more than any other judge, and I
|
|
6
|
furthermore think that the provision for retirement or re-
|
|
7
|
moval when the judge is unable or unwilling, as the case
|
|
8
|
may be, to do his job or do it right, are highly desirable
|
|
9
|
provisions, and I think that power of removal is properly
|
|
10
|
Insed as in this draft in the highest court of the State.
|
|
11
|
MR. ENEY: Judge Brune , would you and Judge
|
|
12
|
Niles comment on the notion that the administrative judge
|
|
13
|
could wield more effective power by being called a chief
|
|
14
|
judge than by being called administrative judge, the mere
|
|
15
|
fact he isdesignated the chief judge inherently gives him
|
|
16
|
greater stature in issuing his quote, orders, unquote?
|
|
17
|
JUDGE BRUNE : Any reply. I might make to that
|
|
18
|
might be considered slightly indelicate in some ways, be-
|
|
19
|
cause for some time as far as I could make out, the actual
|
|
20
|
powers of the chief judge of a number of our trial courts
|
|
21
|
was to sit in the middle if there wore three or more judges
|
