|
|
|
|
|
354 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Feb, 16,
The question recurring upon the adoption of the amend-
ment,
Mr. Naill den anded the yeas and nays.
The demand being sustained,
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows :
AFFIRMATIVE.
Messrs.
Dunbar, Lankford, Coburn,
Bird, Gunby, Gill,
Lancaster, Ford, Chaisty,
Hawkins, Waters, of Dor., Scott,
Hooper, Riggs, Fanow,
Baldwin, Hinks, Ranger,
Smith, of B. co., Naill, Atkinson,
Given, Koons, Brooke,
Fitzjarrell, Rutledge, Rinehar t—28.
Dodson,
NEGATIVE.
Messrs.
Smith, Speaker, Purnell, Hart,
Mattingly, Onley, Loane,
Boyer, Boyle, Hess,
Usilton, Vandiver, Harig,
Robinson, Culbreth, Albaugh,
Rullman, Rusk, Zanders,
Whitelock, Berkemeier, Fenton,
Lambdin, Lewis, Sprigg,
Briscoe, Me Williams, Brown,
Ward, Hoblitzell, Donaldson,
Snowden, McGlone, Clark,
Gwynn, Stewart, Gordy,
Cockey, McAleese, Browning—42.
Neal,
So the amendment was not adopted.
The question then recurring upon concurring in the motion
submitted by Mr. Naill,
Mr. Naill demanded the yeas and nays.
The demand being sustained,
The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.
Messrs.
Bird, Ford, Gill,
Lancaster, Waters, of Dor., Chaisty,
Hawkins, Riggs, Scott,
Baldwin, Hinks, Farrow,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|