clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the House, 1876
Volume 413, Page 1008   View pdf image (33K)
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space
1008 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Mar. 20
Usilton, Purnell, Sanders,
Robinson, Onley, Fenton,
Turner, Koons, Ranger,
Lancaster, Rutledge, Jones,
Hooper, Vandiver, Canby,
Smith, of B. eo., Goldsborough, Griffith,
Given, Rusk, Rawlings,
Fitzjarrell, Berkemeier, Spri jrg,
Dodson, McWilliams, Brooke,
Waters, of Dor., Hoblitzell, Rinehart,
Ward, Stewart, Waters, of Car'l,
Hance, Gill, Clark,
Gwynn, Loane, Barnard—45.
NEGATIVE...
Messrs.
Baldwin, Smith, of Dor., Riggs,
Lankford, Snowden, Naill—7
Ford,
Said bill was then sent to the Senate.
The bill entitled an Act to repeal Section 1, of chapter 388,
of the Acts of 1874, entitled an Act for the protection of
young fish in the waters of Elk river and their tributaries,
within the limits of Cecil county, and to re-enact the same
with amendments,
Was read a second time and ordered to be engrossed for a
third reading.
The Secretary of the Senate returned the following bill:
The bill entitled an Act making Appropriations for the
support of the Government for the year ending 31st of De-
cember 1876, with proposed amendments.
Endorsed: " Passed by yeas and nays with proposed
amendments,"
Which was considered.
Mr. Gill moved that said amendments be non-concurred in,
and proposed a message to the Senate, asking that body to
recede from their proposed amendments.
Mr. Rutledge moved that the further consideration of the
till be postponed until Wednesday next, and that the pro-
posed amendments be printed on the Journal.
The question recurring upon concurring in the motion
Mr. Vandiver demanded the previous question,
The question then being,
"Shall the main question be now put?''
It was decided in the affirmative.


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the House, 1876
Volume 413, Page 1008   View pdf image (33K)   << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives