clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the House, 1904
Volume 408, Page 2015   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

1904.] OF THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES. 2015

mons, Smoot, Walbach, Benson, Cockey, Fitzsimmons,
Green, Stevenson, Collins, Dodson. Jackson, Mil-
bourne, Miles, Riggan, Hopkins, Wingate, Jones,
Murphy, of Dorchester; Keys, Kirk, Fryer, Hill,
Ray, Tighe, Wells. Walls, "Butler, Wilson, Carey,
Dennis, Kirbin, Crawford, Harrison, Harry, Hite-
shew, Andrew, Carroll, Hitchcock, McComas, Goslin,
Willey, Becker, Bosse, Evans, Lipman, Norris, Reed,
Hall, Morrison, Murphy, of Baltimore city; Orem,
Roth, Trager, Bouchet, Dawkins, Durham, Grant,
Linthicum, Moore, Bald, Godwin, Henkel. Lock, Miller
Pairo, Baker, Bingham, Charles, Mitchell, Tennant,
Amiss, Johnston, Lansdale, Williams, Drumm, Feaga,
Stump, Jenkins, Fuss, Haines, Kain, Oursler, Gill,
Pearre, Bennett, Hearn, Messick, Harvey, Howard—99.

Mr. Atkinson arose to a question of personal pri-
vilege, and delivered the following remarks:

1 rise to a point of personal privilege.

Last week I supported the movement to advance to
enactment the so-called Worthington Amendment to
Constitution. I was sincere then in that support and
I am sincere in the position I shall take on the same
measure today.

Upon careful investigation I have been convinced
that the Worthington Amendment should not be fur-
ther pressed upon this House for the following reasons:

First. Because there is in the minds of many of the
leading lawyers of the State and Nation a doubt as to
its constitutionality.

Second. Because its main feature is a property
qualification which not only may alarm non-property
holding white men; but alters, in this State at least, a
principle of suffrage which has always been main-
tained, that man upon attaining the age of twenty-one
years is inherently entitled to a vote and a share of
responsibility in the Government he is compelled to
exist under, whether he had acquired property or not;
provided, he had been convicted of no crime or was
not considered by a majority of his fellow-men to be
a menace to good government. In addition to con-
victed criminals, there are, as I understand it, three

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the House, 1904
Volume 408, Page 2015   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives