clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Senate, 1892
Volume 400, Page 328   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

328 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Feb. 19,

the contestee Bird 151 majority over Talbott; the
prayer of the contestant Bird in his memorial referred
to your committee is that the vote of St. Leonard's
Precinct be counted for him, and that the sitting
member Talbott be unseated and the seat in the Senate
from Calvert county be awarded to him. If the ballots
cast at St. Leonard's are not counted, then the con-
testee Talbott is elected by a majority of 171 votes
and is entitled to retain his seat unless it should be
held, because of the irregularities at St, Leonard's
Precinct, there was no election in Calvert county for
Senator and the election of a Senator be remanded by
the Senate to the voters of the county for a new elec
tion.

Law Applicable to the Facts.

The inquiry that next presents itself is, what are
the terms and provisions of law, in the language of
the Constitution "as prescribed by the Constitution
and the laws of the State" on these facts.

1. Was the election held in the St. Leonard's Pre-
cinct held by officers properly qualified under the law
to hold the election ? The committee think it was not
so held. The two Judges and Ballot Clerk, by stand-
ers who were attempted to be qualified by adminis-
tering the oath above set forth, by the Republican.
Judge, were neither de facto nor de jure proper officers
to conduct a legal election.

The regularly qualified Judges and Ballot Clerk
were displaced for no other reason whatsoever than
that they refused to receive, what in their opinion
and that of the Republican Supervisor, were illegal
ballots.

The duties of the Judges and Ballot Clerk are not
only fully prescribed by law, but the oath is pie-
scribed by law, the oath for Ballot Clerk sets forth in
minute detail his duties. This oath, it is not pre-
tended, was administered or read to him. There is
no law that justified the Republican Judge, under the
circumstances, that existed at the Second Precinct on
the morning of the election, to administer any oath
to the Judges or Ballot Clerks appointed by him,
hence the oath was without legal force, and we have
in effect an election conducted by unsworn officers;
one of the first safeguards for a legal election is want-

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Senate, 1892
Volume 400, Page 328   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives