|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1306 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Mar. 30,
lagher. Sams, Laird, Griffith, Buckey, Stottlemyer,
Haine , Sellman, Tracey, Haslup, Ellegood, Laws,
Moore, Bittinger, Michaels—49.
NEGATIVE.—Messrs. Speaker, Elliott, McSherry,
Gaver, Sappington, of Frederick, Thompson, Fitz-
gerald, Carter, Field, Bowie, of Baltimore cityr
O'Conor, Smith, of Washington, Berret—13.
So the the main question was ordered.
The main question being the proposed amendment
as submitted by Mr. Carter.
Mr. Carter demanded the yeas and nays.
The demand was sustained.
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as fol-
lows :
AFFIRMATIVE.—Messrs. Speaker, Elliott, Buckey,
Stottlemyer, Sellman—5.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Garner, Strong, Wilson, Bra-
shears, Donald son, Hutchins, Ireland, Lane, Carrico,
Maddox, Orrick, Cole,Hamilton, Jr., Collins, Wooters,
Anderson, Sterling, Meredith, Smith, of Dorchester,
Miles, Kirk, Grove, of Cecil, Perrie, Bryan, Wallen,.
Wilkinson, Hayman, Grove, of Frederick, Bevard,
Stearns, Johnson, Brennan, Gallagher, Sams, Garrott,
Laird, Griffith, Haines, Tracey, Haslup, Ellegood,
Laws, Moore, Bittiuger, Michaels—45.
So the proposed amendment was rejected.
Mr. Brennan moved the previous question on the
order.
Mr. Fitzgerald moved to adjourn, and demanded
the yeas and nays.
The demand was sustained.
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as
follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.—Messrs. Speaker, Sappington of
Frederick, Frincke, Garrott, Buckey, Sellman—5.
NEGATIVE.—Messrs. Combs, Garner, Strong, Wilson
Brashears, Donaldson, Hutchins, Ireland, Lane, Cari-
rco, Maddox, Orrick. Cole, Hamilton, Jr , Collins,
Wooters, Anderson, Sterling, Meredith, Smith, of
Dorchester, Miles, Kirk, Grove, of Cecil, Perrie,
Bryan, Wilkinson, Hayman, Grove, of Frederick,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
