752 COURTS. [ART. 26

effects than that taken under the first, though the first be still
outstanding; provided, that but one satisfaction of the debt or
demand shall be made, and that it shall be in the discretion of
the court in all such cases, whether any costs, and if any,
what amount of costs shall be allowed on the subsequent
attachments or other executions; the provisions of this section
shall apply also to attachments or executions directed to a
county different from that where the judgment or decree was
rendered, or to or from the city of Baltimore.

Arnott v. Nicholls, 1 H. & J. 471. Salmon v. Yates, 1 H. & J. 488. Mc-
Elderry v. Smith's Lessee, 2 H. & J. 72. Barney v. Patterson, 6 H. & J. 194.
Hanson v. Barnes' Lessee, 3 G. & J. 359. Mullikin v. Duvall, 7 G. & J 355.
Townshend, Ex'x v Townshend, 10 G. & J. 373. Nesbit v. Manro, 11 G. &.
J. 261 Murphy v. Cord, 12 G & J 182 Miles v Knott, 12 G. & J 443.
Jones v. Jones, 1 Bl. 443. Testier v. Wyse, 3 Bl. 28. Boyd v. Harris, 1 Md.
Ch. 466. Hodges v. Sevier, 4 Md. Ch. 382. Doub v. Barnes, 4 Gill, 1. War-
field v. Brewer, 4 Gill. 265 Cushwa v. Cushwa,' 5 Md 55. Kemp v Cook,
6 Md. 305 Trail v Snouffer, 6 Md. 308. Moore v. Garrettson, 6 Md 444.
Elliott's Lessee v Knott, 14 Me. 121. Huston v. Ditto, 20 Md. 305. Hazle-
hurst v. Morris, 28 Md 67. Hardesty v. Campbell, 29 Md. 533. Mitchell v
Chesnut, 31 Md. 521. Goldsborough v. Green, 32 Md. 91. Kirkland v.
Krebs, 34 Md. 93. Hagerstown Bank v. Thomas, 35 Md. 515. Anderson v.
Graff, 41 Md. 601 Manton v. Hoyt, 43 Md. 264. Weikel v Cate, 58 Md.
110. Lambson v. Moffet 61 Md. 429. Wright v. Ryland, 92 Md. 661.

1888, art. 26, sec. 21 1860, art. 29, sec 18. 1839, ch 14.
21. A judgment rendered against one or more members of
a partnership, or one or more persons jointly liable on any bill,
bond, covenant, promissory note, bill of.exchange, contract or
agreement whatsoever, less than the whole number of partners
or persons so bound shall not workman extinguishment or
merger of the cause of action on which such judgment may
have been rendered, as respects the liability of the partners or
persons not bound by such judgment, and they shall remain
liable to be sued as if their original responsibility had been
joint and several; provided, that but one satisfaction of the
debt or demand shall be made.

Williams v. Hodgson, 2 H. & J. 474. Moale v. Hollins, 11 G. & J 11
Davidson v Kelly, 1 Md. 500. Thomas v. Mohler, 25 Md. 36. Gott v. State,
44 Md. 319. Cruzen v. McKaig, 57 Md. 461.

Ibid. sec. 22. 1888, ch 474.

22. Every order of court, whether in an action, cause or
matter, may be enforced in the same manner and by the same-
writs as a judgment or decree to the same effect.