clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Maryland Code Public General Laws, 1904
Volume 393, Page 745   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ART. 26.] RULES——CONTEMPT. 745

General Provisions.

1888, art. 26, sec. 1. 1860, art. 29, sec. 1. 1715, ch. 41, sec. 2.

1. The judges of the several courts of law and of equity
may make such rules and orders from time to time for the
well-governing and regulating their respective courts and the
officers and suitors thereof and under such fines and forfeitures
as they shall think fit, not exceeding twenty dollars for any
one offense, all of which fines shall go to the State.

Union Bank v. Ridgely, 1 H. & G. 324. Wall's Ex. v. Wall, 2 H. & G. 79.
Middleton v. Edelen, 1 H. & J. 461. Benson v. Davis, 6 H & J. 272 Car-
roll v Barber, 7 H. & J. 454. Dunbar v. Conway, 11 G. & J 92. Oliver v.
Palmei, 11 G. & J. 426. Mitchell v. Mitchell, 1 Gill, 66. Calvert v. Coxe,
1 Gill, 95. Gist v. Drakeley, 2 Gill, 346. Carson v. White, 6 Gill, 21 Bless-
ing v. Hape, 8 Md. 32. Contee's Admr. v. Pratt, 9 Md. 67. Kunkel v.
Spooner, 9 Md. 463. Harwood v. Marshall, 10 Md. 462. Robinson v Com-
missioners of Harford Co., 12 Md 133. Hughes v Jackson, 12 Md. 463.
Davis v. Reed, 14 Md. 157. Ricketts v. Pendleton, 14 Md. 321. Ruther-
ford v. Pope, 15 Md. 579. Cherry v. Baker, 17 Md. 75. Scott v Scott, 17
Md. 78. Morrison v. Welty, 18 Md. 169 Sellers v Zimmerman, 18 Md.
255. Wash. & Balto. T. R. v. State, 19 Md 293 Matthews v. Dare, 20
Md 248. Cook v. Carr, 20 Md. 412. Gambrill v. Parker, 31 Md 1

Ibid sec. 2. 1860, art. 29, sec. 2, 1840, ch 96, sec 2.

2. The judges of the several courts of this State exercising
civil jurisdiction shall prescribe by rule of court the manner in
which suits may be dismissed by the parties or their attorneys
during recess.

Ibid. sec. 3. 1860, art. 29, sec. 3. 1805, ch. 65, sec. 51.

3. No person shall sue or be sued in privilege.
Brooks v. Chesley, 4 H. & Me H. 295. Peters v. League, 13 Md. 59.

Ibid, sec 4. 1860. art. 29. sec. 4. 1853, ch. 450. sec. 1. 1898. ch. 31.
4. The power of the several courts of the State to issue
attachments and inflict summary punishments for contempt of
courts shall not be construed to extend to any cases except the
following: (1) the misbehavior of any person or persons in
the presence of the said courts, or so near thereto as to
obstruct. the administration of justice; (2) the misbehavior
of any officers of the said courts in their official transactions;
(3) the disobedience or resistance by any officer of the said
courts, party, juror, witness or any other person or persons to
any lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree or command of the
said courts; (4) for unlawfully detaining or fraudulently and


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Maryland Code Public General Laws, 1904
Volume 393, Page 745   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  November 18, 2025
Maryland State Archives