ART. 24] REMOVED CASES. 711

1888, art. 24, sec. 7. 1860, art. 27, sec 7. 1781, ch. 11. 1886, ch. 46.

7. No person who may be prosecuted for any misdemeanor
or offence and discharged by the court on submission, or fined
not exceeding fifteen cents, or prosecuted for any crime and
acquitted on trial by jury, shall be burdened with the payment
of any costs or fees accruing on such prosecution, but all such-
costs and fees, with the legal costs of the party accused, shall
be paid by the county; and no person taken upon any warrant
or capias on presentment where no bill of indictment is found
shall be liable to pay or give security for costs, but such costs
shall be paid by the county. The mayor and city council of
Baltimore shall not, however, be liable in any such cases tried
in the criminal court of Baltimore for the appearance fees
allowed by law to the attorney of the traverser.

Schamel v Washington Co., 83 Md. 129.

Ibid. sec. 8. 1860, art. 27, sec. 8. 1794, ch. 54, sec. 10. 1796, ch. 43, sec. 13
1801, oh 74, sec 10

8. Whenever any suit or action, whether in the name of the
State or of an individual shall be marked for the use of any
person, the person for whose use such suit or action is marked
shall be liable for costs as if he were the legal plaintiff.

Lane's Lessee v Gover, 1 H. & McH. 469. Wilson v. Hammitt, 1 H. & J.
141. Harris v. Jaffray, 3 H. & J. 543. Charlotte Hall School v. Greenwell,
4 G & J. 407. State v. Turner, 8 &. & J. 125 Selby et al v. Clayton, 7
Gill, 242. Groshon v. Thomas, 20 Md. 247 State use of Fallen v. Layman,
46 Md. 190

Ibid sec. 9. 1860, art 27, sec 10 1796, ch. 43, sec. 12. 1801, ch. 74, sec. 9.

1900, ch. 382.

91 The defendant in any action may at or before the trial
court have a rule on the plaintiff or plaintiffs to give security
for the payment of costs and charges which may be recovered
against him or them in such action if the plaintiff or plaintiffs,
or any of them, is not a resident or are not residents of this
State at the time the motion is made for such rule; provided,
that such rule shall be had only against a non-resident plain-
tiff or plaintiffs, or against a resident plaintiff or plaintiffs,
who is an assignee or are assignees of or stand in the place
of a non-resident plaintiff or plaintiffs. On such rule being
laid, the plaintiff or plaintiffs shall have until the second day
of the next term of the court to comply therewith, and on his
or their failure to do so he or they shall be non-suited.

Berry v. Griffith, 1 H. & G. 440. Stimmel v. Underwood, 3 G. & J 285.
Haney v. Marshall, 9 Md. 194. Spencer v. Trafford, 42 Md. 1. State use of
Fallon v Layman, 46 Md. 190. Hemekamp v. Bratt, 74 Md. 388 Holt v.
Tenallytown R. H., 81 Md. 220.