32 CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

Barnitz v. Beverly, 163 U. S. 118. Hanford v. Davies, 163 U. S. 273. Cov-
ington, &c Turnpike Co v Sandford, 164 U. S. 578. St. Louis, &c. Ry.
Co. v. Mathews, 165 U. S. 1. Allgeyer v Louisiana, 165 U. S. 678. Water
Power Co. v. Water Commissioners, 168 U. S 349. Douglas v. Kentucky,
168 U. S 488. Hawker v New York, 170 U. S 189 Galveston, &c Ry. Co.
v. Texas, 170 U. S 226 Houston, &c., Ry. Co. v. Texas, 170 U S. 243.
Williams v Eggleston, 170 U. S. 304. Thompson v. Utah, 170 U. S 343.
Chicago, &o. R R Co. v. Nebraska, 170 U S. 57. Thompson v Missouri,
171 U. S 380. Walla Walla v Walla Walla Water Co., 172 U S. 1
McCollough v. Va , 172 U. S 102. Covington v Kentucky, 173 U. S. 231
Citizens Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636. Walsh v Columbus,
&c. R R. Co , 176 U. S 469 Stearns v. Minn., 179 U S. 223. St Paul Gas
Light Co v. St. Paul, 181 U. S. 142. Hale v. Lewis, 181 U. S. 474. Red
River Valley Bank v. Craig, 181 U S. 548. Knoxville Iron Co. v Harbison,
183 U S. 13. OIT v. Gilman, 183 U. S 278. Louisville & Nashville Rd Co.
v Kentucky, 183 U. S 503. Wilson v. Iseminger, 185 U. S 55. Vicksburg
Waterworks Co v. Vicksburg, 185 U. S. 65. Northern Central Ry. Co. v.
Maryland, 187 U S 258. Oshkosh Waterworks Co v. Oshkosh, 187 U. S.
437 Diamond Glue Co. v U. S. Glue Co., 187 U. S. 611. Weber v Rogan,
188 U. S 10. Blackstone v Miller, 188 U. S. 189. Reitz v Michigan, 188
U. S. 505 Waggoner v. Flack, 188 U. S. 595. Joplin v. Southwest Missouri
Light Co., 191 U S. 150. Owensboro v. Waterworks Co., 191 U. S. 358.
Wis & Mich. Ry Co v Powezs, 191 U. S. 379. Citizens Bank v. Parker,
192 U S. 73. Stanislaus Co. v. San Joaquin C. & I Co , 192 U S 201.

No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay
any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what
may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection Laws;
and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any
State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the
Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be
subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

McCulloch v State of Maryland, 4 Wh. 316 Gibbons v Ogden, 9 Wh. 1
Biown v. The State of Maryland, 12 Wh. 419 Mager v. Grima et al, 8
How 490. Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia et al, 12
How. 299. Almy v. State of California, 24 How. 169. License Tax Cases,
5 Wall. 462 Crandall v State of Nevada, 6 Wall. 35. Waring v. The
Mayor, 8 Wall 110. Woodruff v. Perham, 8 Wall 123. Hinson v Lott, 8
Wall. 148 State Tonnage Tax Cases, 12 Wall. 204. State Tax on Railway
Gross Receipts, 15 Wall. 284 Inman Steamship Company v. Tinker, 94 U
S. 238 Cook v Pennsylvania, 97 U. S. 566 Packet Co v-Keokuk, 95 U.
S 80 People v. Compagme Generate Transatlantique, 107 U S 59. Brown
v Houston, 114 U. S. 622 Pittsburgh & So. Coal Co. v. Bates, 156 U. S.
577 Pittsburgh & So Coal Co v La , 156 U S. 590. Patapsco Guano Co.
v. N C , 171 U. S. 345. Diamond Match Co. v. Ontonagon, 188 U. S. 82.

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any
duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of