clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Maryland Code Public General Laws, 1904
Volume 393, Page 216   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

216 APPEALS AND ERRORS. [ART. 5

1888, art. 5, sec. 3. 1860, art 5, sec. 4 1845, ch 7.

3. Any party to a writ of mandamus may appeal; and peti-
tions assigning errors may be filed in civil or criminal cases, in
lieu of the formal writs of error heretofore issued in this State,
in cases where writs of error were formerly allowed.

Quynn v. State, 1H & J. 36. Cummings v. State, 1 H. & J. 340. Anderson
v. State, 5 H. & J. 174. State v. Buchanan, 5 H. & J. 317 Thompson v.
McKim, 6 H. & J. 302. Wall's Exr. v.Wall. 2 H. & G. 79. Hawkins v. Bowie,
9 G. & J. 428. Isaac v. Clarke, 9 O. & J 107. Hall v. State, 12 G. & J. 329.
Chesapeake Bank v. McClellan, 1 Md. Ch. Dec. 330. Bridendolph v. Zeller,
3 Md. 325. State v. Mace, 5 Md. 350. Manly v. State, 7 Md. 135. Davis v
State, 7 Md. 151. Harwood v. State, 9 Md. 108. Ford v. State, 12 Md. 514
Kemp v. Cook, 18 Md. 137 C. C. & I. Co. v. Jeffries, 21 Md. 375. State v.
Boyle, 25 Md. 513. Coston v. Costen, 25 Md. 500. Clare v. State, 30 Md 171.
Davis v. State, 39 Md. 385. McDonald v. State, 45 Md. 90. Dulany v. State,
45 Md. 99. Kearney v. State, 46 Md. 424. Forwood v. State, 49 Md. 538.
Rayner v. State, 52 Md. 374. State v. Wade, 55 Md. 39. State v. Hodges, 55
Md. 127. Green v. State, 59 Md. 123 Ecker v. First Nat Bank, 62 Md. 519.

Ibid. sec. 4. Rule 1.

4. Formal writs of error shall, in all cases, be dispensed
with, and the party applying to have the record removed, as
upon writ of error, in cases where by law writs of error are
allowable, shall, by brief petition, addressed to the court in
which the case was tried, plainly designate the points or ques-
tions of law by the decision of which he feels aggrieved;
which application, so to remove the record, shall be allowed as
of right; and no point or question not thus plainly designated
in such application shall be heard or determined by the court
of appeals.

Davis v. State, 39 Md. 358. Hearn v. Gould, 51 Md. 319 State v. Scar-
borough, 55 Md. 345. State v. Norris, 70 Md. 91. Avirett v. State, 76 Md.
516. State v. Floto, 81 Md. 602.

Ibid, sec. 5. 1860, art 5, sec. 5. 1832, ch. 208.

5. In cases of issues sent from the orphans' court or a
court of equity to a court of law to be tried, exceptions may be
taken to any opinion given by the court before whom such
issues shall be tried, and an appeal may be taken on such
exceptions; and such appeal, while pending, shall stay all pro-
ceedings in the orphans' court touching the matter of such
issues.

Pegg v. Warford, 4 Md. 394. Waring v Edmonds, 11 Md 425. Price v.
Moore, 21 Md. 358. Waters v. Waters, 26 Md. 53. Barth v. Rosenfeld, 36
Md. 604. Berry v. Safe Deposit, etc., 93 Md 243.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Maryland Code Public General Laws, 1904
Volume 393, Page 216   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives