Volume 393, Page 2060 View pdf image (33K) |
2060 TESTAMENTARY LAW. [ART. 93
power of appointment, unless the contrary intention shall
appear in the will or codicil containing such devise or bequest.
Farlow v. Farlow, 83 Md 122. United Railways v. Seymour, 92 Md. 425.
1894, ch 438, sec. 316 A.
324. In all wills hereafter executed, the real estate of every
Pearson v. Wartman, 80 Md. 531. Ewell v. McGregor, 96 Md. 359.
1888, art. 93, sec. 317. 1862, ch. 161
325. In any devise or bequest of real or personal estate,
Woollen v Frick, 38 Md. 428. Goldsborough v. Martin, 41 Md. 488.
Ibid. sec. 318. 1860, art 93, sec. 306. 1810, ch. 34, sec. 1. 1884, ch. 293.
326. No nuncupative will shall hereafter be valid in this
Brayfleld v. Brayneld, 3 H. & J. 208. Dorsey v. Sheppard, 12 G. & 3. 192.
Ibid sec. 319 1860, art. 93, sec. 307. 1810, ch. 34, sec. 2. 1884, ch 293
327. Every will or other testamentary instrument made out |
||||
Volume 393, Page 2060 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.