1994 TESTAMENTARY LAW. [ART. 93

there be not sufficient to discharge all such judgments and
decrees, a proportionate, dividend shall be made between the
judgment and decree creditors.

Hollingsworth v. Patten's Admx., 3 H & McH. 125. Webster o. Ham-
mond, 3 H. & McH. 131. Murray v. Ridley's Admx., 3 H. & McH. 171.
Contee v. Chew's Exr., 1 H. & J. 417. DeSobry v. DeLaistre, 2 H. & J.
191. Brengle v. McClellan, 7 G. & J. 434. Longwall v. Redinger, 1 Gill,
57. Buckey v. Snouffer, 10 Md. 156. Duvall v. Pearson, 18 Md. 504.

1888, art 93, sec. 116. 1860, art. 93, sec. 117. 1823, ch. 131, sec. 2.
.1654, ch. 86, sec. 1.

115. No administrator shall be bound to take notice of any
claim against his decedent unless the same shall be exhibited
to such administrator legally authenticated; or unless such
claim shall have been passed by the orphans' court and
entered by the register upon his docket, or unless a suit shall
be pending against such administrator for such claim.

Bonaparte v. State, 63 Md. 465. Bradford v. Street, 84 Md. 278.

Ibid sec. 117. 1860, art. 93, sec. 118. 1798, ch. 101, sub-ch. 14, sec. 12.

116. Any administrator shall be entitled to appoint a meet-
ing of creditors on some day by the court approved, and
passage of claims, payment or distribution may be there made
under the court's direction and control.
Conner v. Ogle, 4 Md. Ch. Dec. 450.

Ibid. sec. 118. 1860, art. 93, sec. 119. 1798, ch. 101, sub-ch. 10, sec. 6.

117. Whenever it shall appear by the first or other account
of an executor or administrator that all the claims against or
debts of the decedent which have been known by or notified to
him have been discharged or allowed for in his account, it
shall be his duty to deliver up and distribute the surplus
or residue as hereinafter directed; provided, that his power
and duty with respect to future assets shall not cease; and
after such delivery he shall not be liable for any debt after-
wards notified to him; provided, he shall have advertised as
hereinbefore directed, unless assets shall afterwards come into
his hands which shall be answerable for such debts.

Hall v. Griffith, 2 H. & J. 483. Clagett v. Salmon, 5 G. & J. 314. Boyd v.
Boyd, 6 G. & J. 25. Coward v. Worrell, 7 G. & J. 475. Mitchell v. Mitchell,
1 Gill, 66. Gardner v. Simmes, 1 Gill, 425. Ridenour v. Keller, 2 Gill, 134.
Schwenniski v. Glenn, 4 Gill, 23. Lark v. Linstead, 2 Md. Ch. 162. Conner
v. Ogle, 4 Md. Ch. 425. Lark v. Lindstead, 2 Md. 420 Lowe v. Lowe, 6
Md. 347. Iglehart v. Kirwan, 10 Md. 560 Coburn v. Harris, 53 Md 367.