ART. 93] DEBTS. 1987

4 H. & J. 485 Chapman v. Dixon, 4 H. & J. 527. Curtis v. Bank of Somer-
set, 7 H & J. 25. Giles v. Ferryman, 1 H. & G. 169. Kent's Admr v.
Wilkinson, 5 G & J. 497. Mitchell v. Mitchell, 11 G. & J. 388. Bowling
v. Lamar, 1 Gill, 358. Bennington v. Dinsmore, 2 Gill, 348. Young v.
Mackall, 3 Md. Ch. 398. Young v. Mackall, 4 Md. 362. Smith v. Smith's
Admr., 7 Md. 55. Miller v. Dorsey, 9 Md. 317. Semmes v. Young's Admrs ,
10 Md. 243. Yingling v.. Hesson, 16 Md. 120. Felty v. Young, 18 Md 163.
Gordon v. Small, 53 Md. 559.

1888, art. 93, sec. 99. 1860, art. 93, sec. 100. 1798, ch. 101,
sub-ch. 9, sec. 13.

98. No administrator shall be obliged to discharge any claim
of which vouchers and proofs shall be exhibited as aforesaid,
but may reject and at law dispute the same, in case he shall
have reason to believe that the deceased never owed the debt
or had discharged the same or a part thereof or had a claim in
bar.

Bowie v. Ghigelin, 30 Md. 553. Coburn v. Harris, 53 Md. 367. Shaeffer
v. Shaeffer, 54 Md. 679.

Ibid. sec. 100. 1860, art. 93, sec. 101. 1802, ch. 101, sec. 9.

99. In no case shall the order made by the orphans' court
or register of wills that an account or claim will pass when
paid be deemed of validity to establish such claim or account,
but in case the administrator thinks fit to contest the same,

such account or claim shall derive no validity from the order
aforesaid, but shall be proved in the same manner as if no
such order had been made.

Bowie v. Ghlselin, 30 Md. 553. Shaeffer v. Shaeffer, 54 Md. 679 Lever-
ing v. Levering, 64 Md. 399.

Ibid. sec. 101. 1860, art. 93, sec 102. 1798, ch. 101, sub-ch. 8, sec. 14

100. An administrator shall discharge all just claims known
to him, or pay each claimant his just proportion of the money
then in his hands (retaining as herein directed), within thirteen
months from the date of his letters, or within such further
time, not exceeding four months longer, as shall be allowed by
the orphans' court, on his making oath that he hath reason to
apprehend that the personal estate and assets which are or
shall be in his hands will be insufficient to discharge the just
debts of and claims against the deceased; it shall likewise be
his duty, once in every term of six months, after the first dis-
tribution, to make a distribution of the money which hath
since come to his hands, until he shall have fully administered,
and on failure, his administration bond may be put in suit.

Mann v. State, 3 H. & J. 237. West v. Briscoe, 6 H. & J. 460. Hagthorp
v. Hook, 1 G. & J. 270. State v. Bank of Maryland, 6 G. & J. 205. Coward