1978 TESTAMENTARY LAW. [ART. 93

or of administration shall operate as a revocation of such
administration durante minoritate, or pendente lite. And upon
such revocation, it shall be the duty of every administrator
durante minoritate, or pendente lite, to exhibit to the orphans'
court his accounts without delay, and to deliver to the executor
or administrator, on demand, all the goods, chattels and
personal estate in his possession belonging to the decedent;
and on failure, his bond shall be liable to be put in suit by
the executor or administrator; but all suits pending by or
aga'inst any such administrator may be prosecuted or defended
by the executor or administrator appointed to succeed him, in
the same manner as hereinbefore provided where letters of
administration have been revoked by the production of a will,
and the grant of letters testamentary.

Scoffield v. Craddock, 7 H. & J. 40. Blackistone v. Blackistone, 2 H. &
G. 139. State v. Williams, 9 Gill, 176. Hanna v. Munn, 3 Md. 230. Cain
v. Warford, 3 Md. 454. Ibid., 7 Md. 282. Lee v. Price, 12 Md. 253. George-
town College v. Brown, 34 Md. 450. Munnikhuysen v. Magraw, 35 Md.
280. Ibid., 57 Md. 172. Baldwin v. Mitchell, 86 Md. 380. Harrison v.
Clark, 95 Md. 311.

Administration De Bonis Non.

1888, art. 93, sec. 70. 1860, art. 93, sec. 70. 1798, ch. 101, sub-chs 5, 14,

secs. 2, 6.

69. If an executor or administrator shall die before admin-
istration is completed, letters de bonis non or de bonis non cum
testamento annexo may be granted at the discretion of the court,
giving preference, however, to the person entitled if he shall
actually apply for the same; and the form of the letters shall
be as hereinbefore directed, except that the words "not already
administered" shall be added in their proper place; and the
authority conferred thereby shall be to administer all things
herein described as assets, not converted into money and not
distributed and delivered or retained by the executor or former
administrator, under the court's direction.

State v. Hanson, 2 H. & G. 437. State v. Wright, 4 H. & J. 148 Scott v.
Burch, 6 H. & J. 78. Salisbury v. Black, 6 H. & J. 297. Haslett v. Glenn,

7 H. & J. 23. Hagthorp v. Hook's Admrs., 1 G. & J. 274. Allender v.
Riston, 2 G. & J. 86. Glenn v. Smith, 2 G. & J. 493. Sibley v. Williams'
Ex'r, 3 G. & J. 62. Hagthorp v. Neale, 7 G. & J. 13. Alexander v. Stewart,

8 G & J. 226. Ridenour v. Keller, 2 Gill, ,134. Tuck v. Boone, 8 Gill, 189.
Neale v. Hagthorp, 3 Bl. 551. Thomas v. Wood, 1 Md. Ch. 296. Young's
Estate, 3 Md. Ch. 461. Scott v. Fox, 14 Md. 388. Bl own v. Murdook, 16
Md 631. Cecil v. Clark, 17 Md. 520. Seighman v. Marshall's Admr., 17