1658 PLEADINGS, PRACTICE AND PROCESS AT LAW. [ART. 75

4 Md 403. Terry v Bright, 4 Md. 430. Eustace v. Ellicott, 6 Md. 508.
Lohrfink v. Still, 10 Md. 530. Balt. Fire Ins. Co. v. McGowan, 16 Md. 53
Boyd v. Ches. & Ohio Canal Co., 17 Md. 195. Garrett v. Dickerson, 19 Md.
418. Fendergast v. Reed, 29 Md. 398. Deford v. State, 30 Md. 198. Adams
Express Co v. Trego, 35 Md. 47. Ritter v. Offutt, 40 Md. 207. Bowie v.
Neal, 41 Md. 124. Spencer v. Trafford, 42 Md. 1. Scarlett v. The Academy
of Music, 43 Md. 203. Thanhauser v. Savins, 44 Md. 410. Norwood v.
State, 45 Md. 76. Halley v. Jackson, 48 Md. 254. Wright v. Gilbert, 51 Md.
147. Hamburger v. Paul, 51 Md. 229. Schulze v. Fox, 63 Md. 42. Main v.
Lynch, 54 Md. 658. Newcomer v. Kean, 57 Md. 126 B. & O. R. R. Co. v.
State, 62 Md. 481. Thorne v. Fox, 67 Md. 67. Staley v. Thomas, 68 Md.
439. Blumhardt v. Rohr, 70 Md. 330. Gisriel v. Burrows, 72 Md. 366.
Farrell v Mayor, etc., 75 Md. 493. State v. B. & L R. R. Co., 77 Md. 489.
Bolton Mines Co v. Stokes, 82 Md. 63.

1888, art. 75, sec. 35. 1860, art. 75, sec. 24. 1852, ch. 177, see. 9.

36. No continuance shall be granted upon amendments of
the plots, writs, or any of the proceedings, but the case shall
proceed as if no amendment had been made, unless the court
shall be satisfied that the ends of justice require a continuance.

Union Bank v. Ridgely, 1 H. & G 324. Adams Express Co v. Trego, 35
Md. 47. Sittig v. Birkestack, 38 Md. 158. Miller v. Miller, 41 Md. 623.
Clagett v. Easterday, 42 Md. 617. Scarlett v. The Academy of Music, 43
Md. 203.

Ibid. sec. 36. 1860, art. 75, sec. 25 1828, ch 199. 1845, ch. 54.
1846, ch. 328. 1880, ch. 135

37. No writ or action shall abate because of the misnomer
of any plaintiff or defendant named therein, but the court, on
suggestion, supported by the affidavit of the plaintiff or defen-
dant or other proof to the satisfaction of the court that by
mistake the plaintiff has sued in a wrong name or that the party
summoned in virtue of said writ or action is, in fact, the party
intended to be sued by such writ, or in such action, may at any
time before judgment, direct the writ or any of the proceedings
to be amended by inserting therein the true name of any
plaintiff or defendant, at the discretion of the court; this
section to apply to foreign attachments, cases against corpora-
tions, and all other suits and actions.

Union Bank v. Tillard, 26 Md. 452. Rich v. Boyce, 39 Md 323. Than-
hauser v. Savins, 44 Md. 410. Western Union Tel. Co v. State use of Nelson,
82 Md. 306.

Ibid. sec. 37. 1860, art. 75, sec. 26. 1856, ch. 112, sec. 27.

38. If there be a non-joinder or misjoinder of plaintiffs, the
court may allow an amendment by which a plaintiff may be
added or stricken out, as the case may require.

Smith v. Crichton, 33 Md. 103. Wright v. Gilbert, 51' Md. 147. Condon
v. Sprigg, 78 Md. 330. Thillman v. Neal, 88 Md 529.