clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Maryland Code Public General Laws, 1904
Volume 393, Page 1649   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ART. 75] FORMS OF PLEADINGS IN ABATEMENT. 1649

80. And the plaintiff, as to the —— and —— pleas, further
says, that he sues not for the trespasses in the —— pleas (the
pleas not replied to) admitted, but for the trespasses in the ——
pleas (the pleas replied to) admitted, and also for, etc.

Pleas in Abatement.

81. That the plaintiff, at the time of issuing the summons
in this case, was and still is the wife of one R. B.

82. That the plaintiff is within twenty-one years of age;
and has declared by attorney, when he should have declared
by next friend or guardian.

83. That the said contract in the declaration mentioned was
made by the defendant jointly with one W. P., who is still
living, and is residing in the county (or the city) aforesaid;
and was not made by the defendant alone.

[This form shall be sufficient, whether the contract be by
parol or by deed.]

Smith v. Crlchton, 33 Md. 103.

Forms of affidavit to Pleas in Abatement.

84. ———— county.

M. R. (the defendant in the cause), makes oath and says,
that the plea, hereunto annexed, is true in substance and in
fact.*

Sworn before.

Hoffman v. Prout, 4 H. & McH. 165. Deheaulme v. Boiseneuf, 4 H. & McH.
413. Shriver v. Wilson, 5 H. & J. 130. Osgood v. Spencer, 2 H. & G. 133.
Graham v. Fahnestock, 5 Gill, 215. Hamilton v. State, 32 Md. 352. Git-
tings v. State, 33 Md. 463.

Form of Declaration when the summons is returned as to some
of the Defendants non est.

85. R. G., by S. T., his attorney (or in person), sues J. T.
and M. B. (but M. B. has been returned non est by the sheriff),
for (here state the cause of action), and the plaintiff claims
from J. T. (the person summoned), $———.

The affidavit should also contain the averment in the form prescribed by any special
law. Such. e.g as that the affiant verily believes that the defendant will be able to
produce sufficient evidence to support the same, and that he Is advised by counsel to flie
said plea under oath."


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Maryland Code Public General Laws, 1904
Volume 393, Page 1649   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives