1460 LIMITATION OF ACTIONS. [ART. 57

18 Md. 163. Duvall v Pearson, 18 Md 502. Thruston v. Blakiston, 36 Md.
501. Leonard v. Hughlett, 41 Md. 380. Byrd v. State, 44 Md. 492. B &
O R R. v Trimble, 51 Md. 104. Wright v. Gilbert, 51 Md. 146 Johnson
v Foran, 59 Md. 460 Johnson v Hines, 61 Md. 122. Lambson v Moffet,
61 Md. 426.

1888, art. 57, sec. 4 1860, art. 57, sec. 4. 1715, ch. 23, secs. 4, 5.

4. No person absenting himself from this State or that shall
remove from county to county after any debt contracted whereby
the creditor may be at an uncertainty of finding out such
person or his effects shall have any benefit of any limitation
herein contained, but nothing contained in this section shall
debar any person from removing himself or family from one
county to another for his convenience, or shall deprive any
person leaving this State for the time herein limited of the
benefit thereof, he leaving effects sufficient and known for the
payment of his just debts in the hands of some person who
will assume the payment thereof to his creditors.

Brent's Lessee v Tasker, 1 H. & McH 89. Coursey v. Wright, 1 H. &
McH. 394. Pancoast's Lessee v. Addison, 1 H. & J. 350. Murdoch v.
Winter's Admr., 1 H. & G. 474. Hyslnger v. Baltzells, 3 G. & J. 158. Frey
v Kirk, 4 G & J. 509. Maurice t. Worden, 52 Md. 283. Fink v. Zepp, 76
Md. 183.

Ibid sec. 5 1860, art. 57, sec. 5. 1765, ch. 12.

5. If any person liable to any action shall be absent out of
the State at the time when the cause of action may arise or
accrue against him he shall have no ^benefit of the limitation
herein contained if the person who has the cause of action
shall commence the same after the presence in this State of
the person liable thereto within the terms herein limited.

Brent's Lessee v. Tasker, 1 H. & McH. 89. Coursey v. Wright, 1 H. &
McH. 394. Pancoast's Lessee v Addison, 1 H. & J 350. Murdock v.
Winter's Admr., 1 H. & G. 474. Hysinger v. Baltzells, 3 G. & J 158. Frey
v. Kirk, 4 G. & J. 509. Maurice v. Worden, 52 Md. 283. Mason v. Union
Mills, 81 Md. 448...Scaggs v. Reilly, 88 Md. 65.

Ibid sec. 6. 1860, art. 57, sec. 6. 1729, ch. 25, secs. 3, 4. 1818, ch. 216.
1853, ch. 132. 1894, ch. 661.

6. All actions on sheriffs', coroners' and constables' bonds
shall be brought within five years after the date of such bonds
and not afterwards; but the State may sue on said bonds for
her own use at any time; and if any person entitled to suit on
a sheriffs, coroner's or constable's bond shall be at the time of
the accruing of any cause of action on such bond under the
age of twenty-one years or non compos mentis, he or she shall