ART. 46.] VACANT LANDS. 907

Mundell's Lessee v. Clerklee, 3 H & J 462. Ford v. Gwinn, 3 H & J. 496
Canal Co v. R R Co , 4 G. & J 1 Steyer e Hoye, 12 G & J. 202. Hoye v.
Johnston, 2 Gill, 291. Cunningham v. Browning, 1 Bl. 299 R R Co. v.
Hoye, 2 Bl 258. Coombs v. Jordan, 3 Bl 284. Hughlett's Case, 3 Bl. 474.
Chapman v. Hoskins, 2 Md Ch 485.

P. G. L., (1860,) art. 54, sec. 18.

25. If the vacant land, or land which has escheated lies partly
in one county and partly in another, the warrant to survey the
same may be directed to and executed by the surveyor of either
county.

Ibid. sec. 19. 1861, ch. 3.

26. Any person may obtain a common warrant, special war-
rant or proclamation warrant, by applying to the commissioner of
the land office, and paying him (unless the land lies in Allegany
or Washington counties) the sum of twenty-five cents per acre for
each acre mentioned in such warrant; and if the land lies in Al-
legany county, the sum of ten cents per acre; and if the land lies
in Washington county, the sum of twelve and a half cents per
acre.

Hath's Lessee v. Polk, 1 H & McH. 363. Ringgold's Lessee v. Malott, 1 H.
& J 299. Hammond's Lessee v.Warfield, 2 H & J 151. Stewart's Lessee v.
Mason, 3 H & J 507. Stewart v. Donaldson, 5 H. & J. 428. Hoye v. John-
ston, 2 Gill, 291,

Ibid sec. 80.

27. Any person being the owner in fee simple of any lands,
may obtain, by application to the commissioner of the land office,
a warrant of re-survey to re-survey said land, whether the same
consists of one or several tracts or parts of tracts, and may add
any contiguous vacancy thereto.

Seward's Lessee v. Hicks, 1 H & McH 22. Jenifer's Lessee v. Baker, 1 H.
& McH 57. Trammell v. Hook, 1 H & McH 259. Howard's Lessee e Crom-
well, 4 H & McH 325. Ibid , 1 H & J 115. Bcall's Lessee v. Beall, 1 H. &
J. 346. Hammond's Lessee v. Norris, 2 H & J. 130. Hammond's Lessee v.
Warfield, 2 H & J 151. Bradford's Lessee e McComas, 3 H & J. 444. Steyer
v. Hoye, 12 G. & J 202. Lee v. Hoye, 1 Gill, 188. Cabey's Lessee v. Inloes, 1
Gill, 430. Hoye v. Johnson, 2 Gill, 291 Hoffman v. Johnson, 1 Bl 103.
Hughlett's Case, 3 Bl 474 Buckingham v. Dorsey, 1 Md Ch 31. Wilson v.
Markle, 4 Md. Ch. 534. Twigg v. Jacobs, 4 Md Ch. 541

Ibid. sec. 21. 1839, ch. 34, sec. 1. 1841, ch 333. 1854, ch. 322, sec. 1.

28. Any person entitled to lands in fee simple, and being in
possession thereof and not desiring to add contiguous vacancy,