800 HUSBAND AND WIFE. [ART. 45.

bequest, descent, or in a course of distribution, shall be protected
from the debts of the husband, and not in any way be liable for
the payment thereof; provided, that no acquisition of property
passing to the wife from the husband after coverture, shall be
valid if the same has been made or granted to her in prejudice of
the rights of his subsisting creditors.

State v. Krebs, 6 H. & J. 31. Carroll v. Lee, 3 G. & J. 504. Levering v.

Heighe, 2 Md. Ch 81. Ibid , 3 Md. Ch. 370. Wylie v. Basil, 4 Md. Ch. 327.
Cronise v. Clark, 4 Md Ch. 403. Stevens v. Reigart, 1 Gill, 1. Ware v. Rich-
ardson, 3 Md 505. Peacock v. Pembroke, 4 Md. 280. Crane v. Gough, 4 Md.
316. Turton v. Turton, 6 Md. 375. Bowie v. Stonestreet, 6 Md. 418. Logan
v. McGill, 8 Md. 461. Stockett v. Holliday, 9 Md. 480. Unger v. Price, 9 Md.
552. Taggart v. Boldin, 10 Md. 104. Hutchins e Dixon, 11 Md 29. Edelen
v. Edelen, 11 Md 415. Bond's Exr. v. Conway, 11 Md 512. Schindel v.
Schindel, 12 Md 108. Ibid , 12 Md. 294. Chew's Admrs. v. Beall, 13 Md. 348.
Bridges v. McKenna, 14 Md. 266. Gover v. Owings, 16 Md. 92. Lyday v.
Douple, 17 Md 190. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Deale, 18 Md. 47. Lawes v. Lumpkin,
18 Md 334. Jones v. Jones, 18 Md 467. Stockett v. Bird, 18 Md. 485. Weems
v. Weems, 19 Md. 334. Buchanan v. Turner, 26 Md 1. Niller v. Johnson, 27
Md. 6 Kuhn v. Stansfield, 28 Md. 210. Krone B Linville, 31 Md 138. May-
field v. Kilgour, 31 Md 241. Schull v. Murray, 32 Md 9. Barton v. Barton,
32 Md 214 Clark v. Tennison, 33 Md. 86. Rice v. Hoffman, 35 Md. 344.
Groff v. Rohrer, 35 Md. 327. Schley B McCeney, 36 Md. 266. Hill v. Hill, 38
Md. 183. Preston v. Fryer, 38 Md 221. Green v. Early, 39 Md. 223. Gebb
v. Rose, 40 Md 387. Farmers' Bank v. Brooks, 40 Md. 249, Myers v. King,
42 Md. 65. Drury v. Briscoe, 42 Md 154. Oswald v. Hoover, 43 Md. 360.
Plummer v. Jarman, 44 Md 632. Trader v. Lowe, 45 Md. 1. Keller v. Keller,
45 Md. 269. Marburg v. Cole, 49 Md. 412. Hall v.Bryan, 50 Md. 203. Sabel
v. Slingluff, 52 Md. 132. Brown v. Bokee, 53 Md 164 Willis v. Jones, 57 Md.
366. Fladung v. Rose, 58 Md 21. Crane v. BarMoll, 59 Md. 534. Lucke
meyer v. Seltz, 61 Md. 325. Bayne v. State, 62 Md 100. Fowler v. Jacob, 62
Md. 331. Clark v. Wootton, 63 Md. 113. Far & Mer. Nat. Bank v. Jenkins,
65 Md 248.

P. G. L., (1860,) art 45, sec. 3. 1872, ch. 270.

2. The property acquired or owned, according to the pro-
visions of the preceding section, by a married woman, she shall
hold for her separate use, with power of devising the same, as
fully as if she were a feme sole; or she may convey the same by
a joint deed with her husband; or where the husband is a lunatic
or insane, and has been so found upon inquisition, and said find-
ing remains unreversed and in force, she may convey the same
as fully as if she were a feme sole, by her separate deed, whether
the same be absolute or by way of mortgage; provided, that if