ART. 5.] APPEALS FROM ORPHANS COURTS. 39

Appeals from Orphans' Courts.

P. G. L , (1860,) art. 5, sec. 39. 1818, ch. 204, sec. 1.

58. From all decrees, orders, decisions and judgments made by
the orphans' court, the party who may deem himself aggrieved
by such decree, order, decision or judgment, may appeal to the
court of appeals.

Barroll D. Reading, 5 H. & J. 175. Sewell v. Sewell's Admr., 1 H. & J. 9.
Raborg v. Hammond, 2 H. & G. 52. Wilson v. Wilson, 3 G & J. 20. Nesbitt
v. Dallam, 7 G. £ J. 494. Stevenson v. Shriver, 9 G. & J. 324. Mayhew v.
Soper, 10 G. & J. 366. Offut v. Gott, 12 G. & J. 385. Compton v. Compton, 2
Gill, 241. Compton v. Barnes. 4 Gill, 67. Hebb v. Hebb, 5 Gill, 509. Pegg
v. Warford, 4 Md. 385. Warford v. Van Sickle, 4 Md. 397. Ex parte Shipley,
4 Md. 493. Parker v. Gwynn, 4 Md. 426. Plater v. Groome, 5 Md. 96. Trail
v. Snouffer, 6 Md. 315. Falconer v. Regelier, 6 Md. 552. Hoffar v. Stone-
atreet, 6 Md. 303 Watkins v. Bevans, 6 Md 489. Lefevre v. Lefevre, 6 Md 472.
Smith v. Smith's Admr , 7 Md 55. Dorsey v. Warfield, 7 Md. 65. Lammott v.
Maulsby, 8 Md 5. Horsey v. Dorsey, 10 Md. 471. Johnson v. Brannaman,
10 Md 495. Edelen v. Edelen, 11 Md. 416. Porter's Exr. v. Timanus, 12 Md.
283. Hesson v. Hesson, 14 Md. 8. Cecil v. Harrington, 18 Md. 512. Cecil v.
Cecil, 19 Md. 72. Crawford v. Blackburn, 19 Md. 41. Gephart v. Strong, 20
Md. 522. Price v. Taylor, 21 Md. 357. Gunther v. State, 31 Md. 21. Red-
man v. Chance, 32 Md. 42. Magraw v. Munnikhuysen, 35 Md. 291. Den-
nison v. Dennison, 35 Md. 361. Worthington v. Herron, 39 Md. 145. Abbott
v. Golibart, 39 Md. 254. Jones v. Jones, 41 Md. 354. Woods v. Matchett, 47
Md. 390. Covey v. Charles, 49 Md. 314. Bantz v. Bantz, 52 Md. 686. Strite
v. Reiff, 55 Md. 92. Nally v. Long, 56 Md. 567. Johns v. Caldwell, 60 Md.
259. Forney v. Shriner, 60 Md. 419. Hignutt v. Cranor, 62 Md. 216. Brown
v. Johns, 62 Md 333.

Ibid. sec. 40. 1798, ch. 101, sub ch. 15, sec. 18.

59. If the decree, order, decision or judgment shall have been
given or made on a summary proceeding, and on the testimony
of witnesses, the party shall not be allowed to appeal, unless he
shall immediately notify his intention and request that the testi-
mony be reduced to writing, and in such case the depositions
shall be at the cost of the party in the first instance reduced to
writing.

Cecil v. Harrington, 18 Md. 510. Cecil v. Cecil, 19 Md. 73. Gephart v.
Strong, 20 Md. 522. Cannon, Admr. v. Cook, 32 Md. 462. Rokes v. Amazon
Ins. Co., 51 Md. 519. Bowling v. Estep, 66 Md. 564. Biddison v. Moseley, 57
Md 89. Cox v. Chalk, 57 Md. 569.