20 APPEALS AND ERROR. [ART. 5-

eott v. Warford, 4 Md. 80. Owings v. Worthington, 4 Md 261. Alexander
v. Worhington, 5 Md 471. Guyton v. Flack, 7 Md. 398. Cain v. Warford, 7
Md. 282. McCann v. Taylor, 10 Md 419. Roman v. Strauss, 10 Md. 89.
Blondheim v. Moore, 11 Md. 373. Keighler v. Savage Manfg Co , 12 Md. 383.
Stein B. Cox, 16 Md. 533. Mahaney v. Lazier, 16 Md. 69. Hyde v. Ellery, 18.
Md. 499. Griffith v. Clarke, 18 Md 457. Height v. Burr, 19 Md. 132.
Mayor & C. C. v. B. & O. R. R., 21 Md 50. Blackburn v. Crauford, 22 Md.
447. Brady v. Dilley, 27 Md. 570. Everett v. State, 28 Md. 190 Chenowith
v. Smith, 29 Md. 18. Wylie v. Johnstone, 29 Md. 298. Wilhelm v. Caylor, 32
Md. 151. Barton, Ezr., v. Higgins, 41 Md. 539. Barnum v. Bar n urn, 42 Md.
251. Dillon v. Conn. Mutual Life Ins. Co , 44 Md 386. Equitable Mutual
Land Imp. Asso v. Becker, 45 Md 632 Mayor & C. C. of Balto, v.
Weatherby, 52 Md. 442. Reiff v. Horst, 55 Md. 42.. Washington City and
Point Lookout R. R. Co. v. South. Md. R. R. Co., 55 Md. 153. Reeder
v. Machen, 57 Md. 56. Stewart v. Codd, 58 Md. 86. McColgan v. McLaugh-
lin, 58 Md. 499. Shannon v. Wright, 60 Md. 520 Hull v. Caughey, 66 Md..
105. Burroughs v. Gaither, 66 Md 192. Day v. Postal Tel. Co., 66 Md. 370.

P. O. L, (1860,) art 5, sec 22. 1830, ch 185, sec 1. 1845, ch. 367, sec. 3:

26. On an appeal from a final decree or order, all previous;
orders which, may have been passed in the cause shall be open,
for revision in the court of appeals, unless an appeal under the-
preceding section shall have been previously taken from such,
order.

Strike v. McDonald, 2 H & G. 191. Hungerford v. Bourne, 3 G. & J. 133.
Porter v. Askew, 11 G. & J. 346. Dugan v. Gittings, 3 Gill, 138. Ware v.
Richardson, 3 Md 503. Gregg v. Mayor & C C of Balto , 14 Md. 479. Stein
v. Cox. 16 Md. 534. Phelps v. Stewart, 17 Md 231. Vickers v. Tracey, 22.
Md. 196. Wylie v. Johnstone, 29 Md 298 Walsh v. Boyle, 30 Md. 263.
Wilhelm v. Caylor, 32 Md 151. Bull v. Pyle, 41 Md. 419. Barton, Exr., v.
Higgins, 41 Md. 539. Meakin v. Duvall, 43 Md. 378. Reiff v. Horst, 55 Md.
42. Trayhem v. Nat. Mechs. Bank, 57 Md. 590. Mayor & C. C. of Frostburg;
v. Tiddy, 63 Md. 514.

Ibid. sec. 23. 1830, ch. 185, sec. 1. 1845, ch. 367, sec. 1. 1853, ch. 374.

27. No appeal from any order shall stay the execution or
suspend the operation of such order unless the party praying the
appeal shall give bond, with security, to indemnify the other
party from all loss and injury which said party may sustain by
reason of such appeal, and the staying the operation of such
order; such bond to be approved by the judge or clerk of the
court where the proceedings are pending; and upon giving such