22 APPEALS AND ERROR. [ART. 5.
in the court below; nor shall any judgment or verdict be
reversed, if there be one good count in the declaration.

Grant v. Ridsdale, 2 H & J. 186. Wood v. Grundy, 3 H. & 3. 13. Noland
v Ringgold, 3 H. & J. 316. Wilson e. Mitchell, 3 H. & J. 91. Ridgely v.
Riggs, 4 H. & J. 367. Raborg v Bank of Columbia, 1 H. & G. 231. Kent v.
Lyles, 7 G. & J. 73. State v. Turner. 8 G. & J 125. State v. Harrison, 9 G. &
J. 15. Gurley v. Lee, 11 G. & J. 395. Gordon v. Downey, 1 Gill, 41. Smith.
v. Morgan, 8 Gill, 138. Williams e. Bramble, 2 Md. 313. Terry v. Bright, 4
Md. 430. Parrish v. State, 14 Md. 245.

P. G. L, (1860,) art. 29, sec. 38. 1809, ch. 153, sec. 2.

16. All writs of error wherein there shall be any variance
from the original record, or other defect, may be amended and
made agreeable to such record.

Ibid. sec. 39. 1811, ch. 161, sec. 3.

17. No judgment shall be reversed in the court of appeals:
because the verdict was rendered for a larger sum than the
amount laid in the declaration; but the plaintiff below, or his
legal representative, may amend the record by entering a release
of the excess above the sum laid in the declaration.

Harris v. Jaffray, 3 H. & J. 543. Marburg v. Marburg, 26 Md. 8. Frank v.
Morrison, 55 Md 399. Attrill v. Patterson, 58 Md. 260.

Ibid., sec. 40. 1811, ch. 161, sec. 4.

18. If any entry or amendments which the court of appeals
may permit, would require an alteration of the judgment from
which the appeal is taken, the court may, on deciding the
appeal, give such judgment as the entry or amendment may-
require.

Armstrong v. M. A C. C. of Hagerstown, 32 Md. 54. Frank v Morrison, 56
Md. 399.

Ibid., art. 5, sec. 15. 1790, ch. 42, sec 1.

19. If an appeal shall be taken, or writ of error sued out, for
several exceptions, the court of appeals shall give judgment on.
every exception, if a new trial is to be awarded.

Winter v. Donovan, 8 Gill, 376. Owings v. Emery, 3 Md. 190. Boehme v.
Carr, 3 Md. 210.