clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Maryland Code, Public General Laws, 1888
Volume 389, Page 181   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ART. 16.] CHANCERY—PLEADING, PRACTICE, PROCESS. 181

such answer as evidence against the defendant making the same;
but this section shall not apply to motions to dissolve an injunc-
tion or to discharge a receiver.

Coale v. Chase, 1 Bl 136. Salmon v. Clagett, 3 Bl 125. Bellona Co.'s Case,

3 Bl. 442. Washington University v. Green, 1 Md. Ch. 97. Wood v. Patterson,

4 Md Ch. 335. Harris v. Sangston, 4 Md, Ch. 394. Cronise v. Clark, 4 Md. Ch.
403. Doub v. Barnes, 4 Gill, 1. Hutchins v. Hope, 7 Gill, 123. Briesch v.
McCauley, 7 Gill, 187. Winchester v. Balto. & Susque. R R. Co., 4 Md. 231,
Stockett v. Holliday, 9 Md. 486. Warren v. Twilley, 10 Md. 39. Taggart v.
Boldin, 10 Md. 114. Mickle v. Cross, 10 Md. 360. Hamilton v. Whitndge, 11
Md. 144 Bouldin v. Mayor & C. C , 15 Md. 22. Gelston v. Rullman, 15 Md.

267. Mahaney v. Lazier, 16 Md. 69. Rich v. Levy, 16 Md. 74. Dorn v. Boyer,
16 Md 145. Dorsey v. Hagerstown Bank, 17 Md 412. Colvin v. Warford, 17
Md. 433 State v. N. C. R. W. Co., 18 Md 194. Hubbard v. Mowbray, 20 Md.
165 Huston v. Ditto, 20 Md. 306. Polk v. Rose, 25 Md. 153. Watson v.
Watson, 58 Md. 442. Dieffenbach v. Vogeler, 61 Md. 378.

Rule 27.

147. If the plaintiff in his bill shall not require an answer

under oath, or shall only require an answer under oath with
regard to certain specified interrogatories, the answer of the
defendant, though under oath, except such part thereof as shall
be directly responsive to such interrogatories, shall not be

evidence in his favor, unless the cause be set down for hearing on
bill and answer only; but an answer under oath may, neverthe-
less, be used as an affidavit, with the same effect as heretofore, on
a motion to grant or dissolve an injunction, to appoint or dis-

charge a receiver, or on any other incidental motion in the cause

Rule 28.

148. Whenever the answer of the defendant shall not be

excepted to, or shall be adjudged or deemed sufficient, the plain-
tiff shall file the general replication thereto within fifteen days
thereafter, unless he shall set the cause down for hearing on bill
and answer as to said defendant or defendants answering; and in
all cases where the general replication is filed, the cause shall be
deemed to all intents and purposes at issue, without any rejoinder
or other pleading on either side. If the plaintiff shall omit or
refuse to file such replication within fifteen days after answer
filed, the defendant shall be entitled to a rule further proceed-
ings within ten days after notice of such rule; and upon failure to
comply with such rule, the defendant shall be entitled to have

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Maryland Code, Public General Laws, 1888
Volume 389, Page 181   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives