clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Maryland Code, Public General Laws, 1888
Volume 389, Page 155   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ART. 16.] CHANCERY—INJUNCTION—JURISDICTION. 155-

or motion to .rescind an order appointing a receiver, the court
may, at the instance of either party, order testimony to be
taken before such person, and upon such notice and in such
manner as the court in its discretion may direct, to be used at
the hearing of such motion.

Lamborn v. Covington Co , 2 Md Ch. 412 Hamilton v. Whitridge, 11 Md.
128. Keighler v. Savage Hunfg Co.. 12 Md 413. Bouldin n Mayor & C. C.
15 Md. 18 Bell v. Purvis, 15 Md. 22. Steigerwold v. Winans, 17 Md 62.
Colvin v. Warford, 18 Md 275. Griffith e Clarke, 18 Md. 457. Belt v. Black-
burn, 28 Md 227. Mayor & C. C. v. Warren Manfg Co., 59 Md. 96.

1888, ch. 260.

69. No court shall refuse to issue a mandamus or injunction
on the mere ground that the party asking for the same has an
adequate remedy in damages, unless the party against whom the
same is asked shall show to the court's satisfaction that he has
property from which the damages can be made, or shall give a
bond in a penalty to be fixed by the court, and with a surety or
sureties approved by the court, to answer all damages and costs
that he may be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction.
to pay to the party asking such mandamus or injunction by
reason of his not doing the act or acts sought to be commanded,
or by reason of his doing the act or acts sought to be enjoined,
as the case may be.

Jurisdiction.

P. G. L., (1860,) art. 16, sec. 56. 1852, ch 16, sec. 1. 1853, ch. 122, sec. 2.

70. The judges of the several judicial circuits and the judge
of the circuit court of Baltimore city, shall each, in his respec-
tive circuit, have and exercise all the power, authority and juris-
diction which the court of chancery formerly held and exercised,
except in so far as the same may be modified by this code.

Carroll v. Lee, S G. & J. 504. Brown v. Wallace, 4 G. & J 493 White v
White, 7 G &J. 208. Amelung v. Seckarop, 9 G. & J. 468. Manly v. State, 7
Md. 146. Earle v. Turton, 26 Md. 23.

Ibid, sec 57. 1852, ch. 16, secs. 2-4.

71. Each of the circuit judges may grant injunctions, or pass
orders or decrees in equity, at any place in his circuit, to take
effect in any part of his circuit, and may require in writing the

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Maryland Code, Public General Laws, 1888
Volume 389, Page 155   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives