1360 TESTAMENTARY LAW. [ART. 93.
proper; or if, in their opinion, upon a view of such, articles, no
distribution amongst the persons entitled could be made by them,
which would operate equally, but a sale thereof would be more
advantageous to them, they shall return to the orphans' court
their opinion in writing, and the court shall thereupon order a
sale of such articles upon reasonable notice, and cause the proceeds
of such sale to be equally distributed among the parties entitled.
Wilson v. McCarty, 65 Md. 277. Shriver B. State, 65 Md. 278.
1884, ch. 49.
139. Whenever an account is passed in the orphans' court,
either by an executor or administrator, whereby distribution of
chattels real is made to the legatees thereof, or to the parties
thereto entitled in the course of distribution, the orphans' court
shall, upon the passing of such account, pass an order directing
the executor or administrator to convey such chattels real to the
distributees or legatees thereof; and the executor or administrator
shall thereupon so convey the same to such distributees or legatees
by a proper deed, to be executed, acknowledged and recorded ac-
cording to law.
P. G. L., (1860,) art. 93, sec. 140. 1798, ch. 101, sub-ch. 10, sec. 7.
140. When any person entitled, after payment of debts, shall
be in want of subsistence, or greatly straitened in his circum-
stances, and shall apply to the orphans' court by petition, and
shall satisfy the court that he is in want of subsistence or greatly
straitened in circumstances, and that it probably will not require
more than one-half of the assets to discharge the debts, the court,
may direct the administrator to deliver to the petitioner any part
of what the court shall suppose will be his distributive share, or
any part of a legacy or bequest in money not exceeding one-third
part, the said petitioner giving bond, with security approved by
the court, to the administrator, for returning the same or an equiv-
alent, with interest, whenever so directed by the court, and the
court shall have power to determine in a summary way on any
such petition, after summons against such administrator duly re-
turned summoned or returned non est.
Lowe v. Lowe, 6 Md. 347. Donaldson'a Ezis. v. Raborg's Admx., 26 Md.
312. Ibid, 28 Md. 84.
|
![clear space](../../../images/clear.gif) |