ART. 93.] DEBTS. 1347

P. G. L., (1860,) art 93, sec. 98. 1798, ch. 101, sub-ch. 9, sec. 15.

97. No administrator shall be allowed in his account for any

claim discharged by him unless he produce the claim passed by
the orphans' court, or proven as herein directed.

Owens v. Collinson, 3 G. & J. 25. Bowie v. Ghiselin, 30 Md. 553. Coburn
v. Harris, 53 Md. 367. Bonaparte v. State, 63 Md. 465.

Ibid. sec. 99. 1798, ch. 101, sub-ch. 9, sec. 9.

98. It shall not be considered as the duty of an administrator
to avail himself of the act of limitations to bar what he supposes
to be a just claim, but the same shall be left to his honesty and

discretion.

Forbes v. Perrie's Admr., 1 H & J. 109. Scrivener's Admr. v. Scrivener's
Exrs., 1 H. & J. 743. Lansdale v. Ghequiere, 4 H. & J. 257. Bonney v Smith,
4 H. & J. 485. Chapman v. Dixon, 4 H. & J. 527. Curtis v. Bank of Somerset,
7 H & J 25. Giles v. Ferryman, 1 H. & G. 169. Kent's Admr. v. Wilkinson,
5 G. & J 497. Mitchell v Mitchell, 11 G. & J 388. Bowling v. Lamar, 1 Gill,

258. Remington v. Dmsmore, 2 Gill, 348. Young v. Mackall, 3 Md Ch. 398.

Young v. Mackall, 4 Md 362 Smith v. Smith's Admr , 7 Md 55. Miller o.

Dorsey, 9 Md. 317. Semmes v. Young's Admrs , 10 Md 243. Yingling v. Hes-
son, 16 Md. 120. Feltz v. Young, 18 Md 163. Gordon v. Small, 53 Md. 559.

Ibid. sec. 100. 1798, ch. 101, sub-ch. 9, sec. 13.

99. No administrator shall be obliged to discharge any claim
of which vouchers and proofs shall be exhibited as aforesaid, but
may reject, and at law dispute the same, in case he shall have
reason to believe that the deceased never owed the debt, or had

discharged the same or a part thereof, or had a claim in bar.

Bowie 9. Ghiselin, 30 Md. 553. Coburn v. Harris, 53 Md. 367. Shaeffer v.
Shaeffer, 64 Md. 679.

Ibid. sec. 101 1802, ch. 101, sec. 9.

100. In no case shall the order made by the orphans' court or
register of wills, that an account or claim will pass when paid, be
deemed of validity to establish such claim or account, but in case
the administrator thinks fit to contest the same, such account or
claim shall derive no validity from the order aforesaid, but shall
be proved in the same manner as if no such order had been made.

Bowie v. Ghiselin, 30 Md. 553. Shaeffer v. Shaeffer, 54 Md. 679. Lever-
ing v. Levering, 64 Md. 399.