ART. 93.] DEBTS. 1343

522. Mitchell v.Williamson, 6 Md. 210. Edelen v. Edelen, 11 Md. 419. Cover
v. Stockdale, 16 Md. 1. Yingling v. Hesson, 16 Md 112 Cecil v. Negro Rose,
17 Md. 93. Kent v. Waters, 18 Md. 72. Coburn v. Harris, 53 Md. 367 Bona
parte v. State, 63 Md. 465.

P. G. L., (1860), art. 93, sec. 84. 1798, ch. 101, sub-ch. 9, sec. 1.

84. The voucher or proof of a judgment or decree shall be a
ehort copy thereof under seal, attested by the clerk of the court
where it was obtained, who shall certify that there is no entry or
proceeding in the court to show that the said judgment or decree
hath been satisfied. There shall likewise be a certificate of some
person authorized to administer an oath, endorsed on or annexed
to a statement of the debt due on such judgment or decree, that
the creditor, since the death of the deceased, hath taken before
him the following oath, to wit: "That he hath not received any
part of the sum for which the judgment or decree was passed,
except such part (if any) as is credited;" and if the creditor on
the judgment or decree be an assignee of the person who obtained
it, the oath shall go on and say further, " and that to the best of
his knowledge or belief, no other person hath received any parcel
of the said sum, except such part (if any) as is credited;" and an
assignee shall also produce the assignment under the hand of the
assignor; and if there be more than one assignment, each assign-
ment shall be produced under the hand of the party.
Third National Bank v. Lanahan, 66 Md. 469.

Ibid. sec. 86. 1798, ch. 101, sub-ch. 9, sec. 3.

85. If there be more than one creditor, the whole oath, with
the other vouchers, shall be sufficient.

Ibid. sec. 87. 1798, ch. 101, sub-ch. 9, sec. 4.

86. In case of a specialty, bond, note or protested bill of ex-
change, the vouchers shall be the instrument of writing itself, or
a proved copy in case it be lost, with a certificate of the oath
made as aforesaid since the death, and endorsed on or annexed to
the instrument, or a statement of the claim "that no part of the
money intended to be secured by such instrument hath been
received, or any security or satisfaction given for the same except
what (if any,) is credited."

Watson v. Watson, 58 Md. 442.