ART. 75.] PRACTICE—REMOVAL OF CAUSES. 1143

of Balto, v. Co. Commrs, of Balto Co , 19 Md. 5S4 Griffin v. Leslie, 20 Md. 18.
Gardner v. State, 25 Md 146 Price v. Nesbitt, 29 Md. 256 Deford t. State,
30 Md 179. Gore v.State, 32 Md 498. Kimball v. Harman, 34 Md. 401 Adams
Express Co. v. Trego, 35 Md 47. Bittig v. Birkestack, 38 Md. 1S8 Beth v.
Chamberlain, 41 Md. 186 Cooke v. Cooke, 41 Md 362. N. C. R W. Co. v.
Rutlege, 41 Md. 372 Trayhem v. Hamill, 53 Md. 92. Weiskittle v. State, 58
Md. 155. Murguiondo v. Frazier, 63 Md. 95.

1868, ch. 180. 1874, ch. 864.

98. When any suit or action, issues or petitions, presentment
or indictment for offences which are or may be punishable by
death shall be removed according to the provisions of the pre-
ceding section, it shall and may be lawful for the party at whose
instance the said suit or action, issues or petition, presentment or
indictment, was not removed, if he shall think that justice cannot
be done him in said court to which said suit or action, issues or peti-
tion, presentment or indictment, has been removed, to file an affi-
davit, as prescribed by the preceding section, in said court to which
said removal is ordered, suggesting that he cannot have justice in
such court, whereupon the said court shall remove the said cause,
suit, or action, issues or petition, presentment or indictment, to
such other court, having jurisdiction in such cases, as the said
court shall think will best tend to justice between the parties to
the said suit or action, issues or petition, presentment or indict-
ment. When any presentment or indictment for offences which
are not or may not be punishable by death, shall be ordered to
be removed under the provisions of the preceding section,
no removal shall be ordered by the court to which the same
shall have been removed, upon the application of the party
at whose instance such presentment or indictment was not re-
moved, unless in the exercise of its discretion the said court shall
be satisfied by proof that such removal is necessary for the pur-
pose of a fair and impartial trial.

P G L , (1860,) art. 75, sec. 76. 1865, ch. 187. 1868, ch. 180.

99. It shall be in the power and discretion of the court,
should they think it proper, to cause a special panel of forty-
eight jurors to be selected by the sheriff from the community
at large, to try any cause or causes removed under the two
preceding sections; and the court shall direct the clerk thereof