clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
The Maryland Code, Public General Laws, 1888
Volume 389, Page 1135   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ART. 75.] EJECTMENT—EQUITABLE DEFENCES. 1135

passes cannot be, and have not been, located on the plats, and
notwithstanding that the defendant has taken defence on warrant.
Budd v. Brooke, 3 Gill, 198. Wilson v. Inloes, 6 Gill, 152. Mitchell v.
Mitchell, 8 Gill, 102. Houck v. Loveall, 8 Md. 63.

P. G. L., (1860,) art. 75, sec. 57. 1852, ch. 177, sec. 7. 1829, ch. 186

81. The plats and certificates of survey in every case may be
amended at bar; where the locations do not correspond with the
variation, the same may be amended at bar to correspond there-
with ; objects to which the proof applies may be placed on the
plats, and witnesses may be examined who were not sworn on the
survey; provided, the court shall be satisfied the ends of justice
will be attained by such amendment of plats, and admission of
witnesses.

Berry's Lessee v. Willett, 2 H. & McH. 376. King v. Tarlton, 2 H & McH.
473. Scott's Lessee v. Ollabaugh, 3 H. & McH 511. Gill's Lessee v. Cole, 3
H. & McH. 576. Chaplin's Lessee v. Keedy, 3 H. & McH. 578. Gittings'
Lessee v. Hall, 1 H. & J 14. Howard's Lessee &. Cromwell, 1 H. & J. 115.
Darnall's Lessee v. Goodwin, 1 H. & J. 282 Hall v. Gittings' Lessee, 2 H. &
J. 112. Ibid , 2 H. & J. 380. Stoddert's Lessee v. Manning, 2 H. & J. 148.
Howard v. Moale's Lessee, 2 H. & J. 249. Tenant v. Hambleton, 3 H & J. 233.
Stewart's Lessee v. Mason, 3 H. & J. 507. Bowie v. O'Neale, 5 H. & J. 226.
Wall v. Forbes, 1 H. & G. 441. Rogers' Lessee B. Raborg, 2 G. & J. 54. Addi-
son v. Hack, 2 Gill, 221. Mitchell v. Mitchell, 8 Gill, 102. Armstrong v.
Risteau, 5 Md 257. Tyson v. Shuhey, 5 Md. 540. Carroll's Lessee v. Granite
Manuf. Co , 11 Md. 400. Morrison v. Hammond's Lessee, 27 Md 604.

Ibid. sec. 58. 1852, ch. 177, sec. 8.

82. In no action shall plats' be considered as pleadings or
evidence per se; nor shall any counter location be necessary to
put the party locating any tract, line or object, on the proof of
such location; and the opposite party may controvert the some
without any counter location.

Mundell v. Perry, 2 G & J. 205. Medley v. Williams, 7 G. &. J 68 Casey
v. Inloes, 1 Gill, 430. Budd v. Brooke, 3 Gill, 228. Funk v. Hughes. 5 Gill,
315. Clary v. Kimmel, 18 Md. 246. Newman v. Young, 30 Md. 419.

Equitable Defences.

1888, ch. 547.

83. It shall be lawful for the defendant in any action at law
(including plaintiff in replevin where avowry or cognizance is

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
The Maryland Code, Public General Laws, 1888
Volume 389, Page 1135   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives