ART. 75.] PRACTICE—AMENDMENT. 1119

J. 437. Kiersted v. Bogers, 6 H. & J. 282. Stoddert v. Newman, 7 H. & J.
251. Union Bank v. Ridgely, 1 H. & G. 324. Berry v. Griffith, 2 H. & G. 337.
Clarke v. Bealmear, 1 G. & J. 443. Beiry v. Harper, 4 G. & J. 467. Brown v.
Jones, 10 G. &. J. 334. Byine v. McPherson, 12 G. & J. 157. Gordon v.
Downey, 1 Gill, 41. Chapman v. Davis, 4 Gill, 166. Gardiner v. Miles, 5 Gill,
94. Clarke v. Digges, 5 Gill, 109. Crockett v. Parke, 7 Gill, 240. Mitchell B.
Williamson, 9 Gill, 77. Mitchell v. Smith, 4 Md 403. Terry v. Bright, 4 Md.
430. Eustace v. Ellicott, 6 Md. 508. Lohrfink v. Still, 10 Md. 530. Bolt.
Fire Ins Co. v. McGowan, 16 Md. 53. Boyd v. Ches. & Ohio Canal Co , 17
Md. 195. Garrett v. Dickerson, 19 Md. 418. Pendergast v. Reed, 29 Md. 398.
Deford v. State, 30 Md. 198. Adams Express Co. ». Trego, 35 Md. 47. Bitter
t. Offutt, 40 Md. 207. Bowie v. Neal, 41 Md. 124. Spencer v. Trafford, 42
Md. 1. Scarlett v. The Academy of Music, 43 Md. 203. Thanhanser v. Savins,
44 Md. 410. Norwood v. State, 45 Md. 76. Halley v. Jackson, 48 Md. 254.
Wright v.Gilbert, 51 Md. 147, Hamburger v. Paul, 51 Md. 229. Schulze v.
Fox, 53 Md. 42. Main v. Lynch, 54 Md. 658. Newcomer v. Kean, 57 Md.
126. B. & O. R. R. Co. v. State, 62 Md. 481. Thorne v. Fox, 67 Md. 67.

P. G. L., (1860,) art. 75, sec. 24. 1852, ch. 177, sec. 9.

35. No continuance shall be granted upon amendments of the
plots, writs, or any of the proceedings, but the case shall proceed
as if no amendment had been made, unless the court shall be sat-
isfied that the ends of justice require a continuance.

Union Bank v. Ridgely, 1 H & G 324 Adams Express Co v. Trego, 35
Md 47. Sittig v Birkcstuck, 38 Md 158. Miller v. Miller, 41 Md 623 Clagett
v. Easterday, 42 Md. 617. Scarlett v. The Academy of Music, 43 Md 203

Ibid sec. 25. 1828, ch. 199. 1845, ch. 54. 1846, ch. 328. 1880, ch. 135.

36. No writ or action shall abate because of the misnomer of
any plaintiff or defendant named therein, but the court, on sug-
gestion, supported by the affidavit of the plaintiff or defendant,
or other proof to the satisfaction of the court, that by mistake
the plaintiff has sued in a wrong name, or that the party sum-
moned in virtue of said writ or action is, in fact, the party in-
tended to be sued by such writ, or in such action, may at any
time before judgment, direct the writ or any of the proceedings
to be amended by inserting therein the true name of any plaintiff
or defendant, at the discretion of the court; this section to apply
to foreign attachments, cases against corporations, and all other
suits and actions.

Union Bank v. Tillard, 26 Md. 452. Thanhauser v. Savins, 44 Md. 410.
Rich v. Boyce, 39 Md. 323.