Volume 389, Page 1109 View pdf image |
ART. 75.] REPLICATIONS—NEW ASSIGNMENT. 1109 74. That the defendant was not, and is not now, the wife of one W. T., as alleged.
75. That the defendant did not make the alleged deed by
76. That the alleged deed was not procured by the fraud of
77. That the defendant did not commit the alleged assault New Assignment.
(If the plaintiff replies and new assigns, the new assignment
78. The plaintiff, as to the —— and —— pleas, says, that Day v. Allender, 22 Md 511.
79. And the plaintiff, as to the —— and —— pleas, further
(If the plaintiff replies and new assigns to some of the pleas,
80. And the plaintiff, as to the —— and —— pleas, further (the pleas replied to,) admitted, and also for, &c. Pleas in Abatement.
81. That the plaintiff, at the time of issuing the summons in
82. That the plaintiff is within twenty-one years of age; and |
||||
Volume 389, Page 1109 View pdf image |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.