1106 PLEADINGS, PRACTICE AND PROCESS AT LAW. [ART. 75.

v. Ridgely, 1 H. & J. 104. Smith v. Williamson, 1 H. & J 147. Lansdale v.
Ghequiere, 4 H. & J. 259. Oliver v. Gray, 1 H. & G. 215. Murdock v. Winter,
1 H. & G. 471. Wall's Ex'r v. Wall, 2 H. & G. 79. Crain v. Yates, 2 H. & G
332. Green v. Johnson, 3 G. & J. 389. State v. Green, 4 G. & J. 381. Cham-
bers v. Chambers, 4 G. & J. 420. Dorsey v. Dorsey, 6 G. & J. 12. Nelson v.
Bond, 1 Gill, 218. Bennington v. Dinsmore, 2 Gill, 348. Beanes v. Hamilton,
3 Gill, 275. Schleigh v. Hagerstown Bank, 4 Gill, 306. Newcomer v. Keedy,
9 Gill, 263. Strike v. State, 1 Bl. 57. Hepburn v. State, 3 Bl. 95. Dixon v.
Dixon, 1 Md. Ch. 271. Young's Estate, 3 Md. Ch. 461. Mitchell v. Sellman,
5 Md 376. Stockett v. Sasscer, 8 Md. 374. Kunkel v. Spooner, 9 Md. 462,
Williams v. Banks, 19 Md. 23. B. & W. T. R. v. State, 19 Md. 241.

51. That before this action, he satisfied and discharged the
plaintiff's claim by payment.

Geiser v. Kershner, 4 G. & J. 305. Hardy v. Coe, 5 Gill, 189. Jones v. Rick-
etts, 7 Md. 116. Campbell v. Booth, 8 Md. 107. Booth v. Campbell, 15 Md.
669. Brown v. Rowles, 21 Md. 11. Oberndorf v. Union Bank, 31 Md. 132.
Maddox v. Bevan, 39 Md. 485. Loney v. Bailey, 43 Md. 10. Ibid. 45 Md. 447.
Anderson v. Rohr, 51 Md 205. Ingersoll v. Martin, 58 Md. 74.

52. That the plaintiff is indebted to the defendant in an
amount equal to (or greater than) the plaintiff's claim, for (insert
the cause of set-off as in a declaration,) which amount the defen-
dant is willing to set-off against the plaintiff's claim.

53. That after the alleged claims accrued, and before suit, the
plaintiff, by deed, released the defendant therefrom.

Patapsco Co. v. Smith, 6 H. & J. 166. Bowers v. State, 7 H. & J. 32. Clop-
per v. Union Bk , 7 H. & J. 103. Wyman v. Gray, 7 H. & J. 409. Glenn v.
Smith, 2 G. & J. 493. Moale v. Hollins, 11 G & J. 11. Jones v. Ricketts, 7
Md 117. State v. Gott, 44 Md 341. Ingersoll v. Martin, 68 Md. 74.

54:. That at the circuit court for ———— county, ———— term,
the plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant for the
sum of ———— dollars and ———— cents, and ———— dollars for
costs; and that said judgment was rendered on the same cause of
action mentioned in the plaintiff's declaration, and is still a sub-
sisting judgment.

Shafer v. Stonebraker, 4 G. & J 360 Whitehurst v. Rogers, 38 Md 518.

55. That he was discharged as an insolvent debtor by the
circuit court for ———— county, (or court of common pleas for
the city of Baltimore,) on the ———— day of ————, and that the
alleged claim accrued before the filing of his petition.