ART. 75.] FORMS OF DECLARATIONS FOR WRONGS. 1103

Form, by Assignee of Chose m Action.

27. —— county, ss: A. B., by S. T., his attorney, sues C. D.
for that the said defendant was indebted to one E. F. for goods
sold and delivered, (or for whatever he was indebted, whether.
money lent or other things, or if by bond or bill obligatory, state
the date of the bond or bill obligatory, and the sum thereon due,)
which the said E. F. assigned to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff
claims therefor, $——.

S. T., Plaintiff's Attorney.

Union Bank v. Tillard, 26 Md. 446.

for Wrongs Independent of Contract.

28. That the defendant broke and entered certain land of the
plaintiff, cailed " The Orchard," in ———— county, and depastured
the same with cattle.

29. That the defendant assaulted and beat the plaintiff, gave
him into the custody of a constable, and caused him to be impris-
oned in the jail of ———— county (or city).

Gaither v. Blowers, 11 Md 555 Mitchell v. Lemmon, 34 Md 176. Roddy
v. Finnegan, 43 Md. 490. P., W. & B R R. Co. v. Larkin, 47 Md. 155.

30. That the defendant debauched and carnally knew the
plaintiff's wife; or that the defendant debauched and carnally
knew the plaintiff's daughter and servant, whereby he lost her
.service.

31. That the defendant converted to his own use, or wrong-
fully deprived the plaintiff of the use and possession of the
plaintiff's goods; that is to say, wheat, rye, household furniture,
(or as the cose may be).

Meixsell v. Carr, 25 Md. 46. Streeks v. Dyer, 39 Md , 427. Manning v.
Brown, 47 Md. 507.

32. That the plaintiff was possessed of a mill, called " Linga-
nore mill," in ———— county, and as such possessor was entitled
to the flow of a stream for working the same, and the defendant,
by cutting the bank of said stream, diverted the water thereof
away from the said mill.

33. That the plaintiff was possessed of land, called " Idlewild,"
in ———— county, and was entitled to a way from said land, over